医学
痔疮
硬化疗法
随机对照试验
结扎
外科
麻醉
作者
Helen MacRae,Roger S. McLeod
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:1997-02-01
卷期号:40 (1): 14-7
被引量:131
摘要
To determine whether any method of hemorrhoid therapy has been shown to be superior in randomized trials.A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials assessing two or more treatment modalities for symptomatic hemorrhoids.Response to therapy, the need for further therapy, complications and pain.Eighteen trials were available for analysis. Hemorrhoidectomy was found to be significantly more effective than manual dilatation of the anus (p = 0.0017) and associated with less need for further therapy (p = 0.034), no significant difference in complications (p = 0.60) but more pain (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy had a better response to treatment than did patients who were treated with rubber-band ligation (p = 0.001), although complications were greater (p = 0.02), as was pain (p < 0.0001). Rubber-band ligation was better than sclerotherapy in response to treatment for all hemorrhoids (p = 0.005) and for hemorrhoids stratified by grade (grades 1 and 2, p = 0.007, grade 3, p = 0.042), with no difference in the complication rate (p = 0.35). Patients treated with sclerotherapy (p = 0.031) or infrared coagulation (p = 0.0014) were more likely to require further therapy than those treated with rubber-band ligation, although pain was greater after rubber-band ligation (p = 0.03 for sclerotherapy, p < 0.0001 for infrared coagulation).Rubber-band ligation is recommended as the initial mode of therapy for grades 1 to 3 hemorrhoids. Although hemorrhoidectomy showed better response, it is associated with more complications and pain than rubber-band ligation. Thus, it should be reserved for patients whose hemorrhoids fail to respond to rubber-band ligation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI