Higher versus lower fractions of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the intensive care unit

医学 重症监护室 充氧 重症监护 吸入氧分数 临床试验 随机对照试验 重症监护医学 缺氧(环境) 氧气疗法 急诊医学 麻醉 氧气 内科学 机械通风 化学 有机化学
作者
Thomas Klitgaard,Olav L. Schjørring,Frederik Mølgaard Nielsen,Christian S. Meyhoff,Anders Perner,Jørn Wetterslev,Bodil Steen Rasmussen,Marija Barbateskovic
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2023 (9) 被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd012631.pub3
摘要

Background This is an updated review concerning 'Higher versus lower fractions of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the intensive care unit'. Supplementary oxygen is provided to most patients in intensive care units (ICUs) to prevent global and organ hypoxia (inadequate oxygen levels). Oxygen has been administered liberally, resulting in high proportions of patients with hyperoxemia (exposure of tissues to abnormally high concentrations of oxygen). This has been associated with increased mortality and morbidity in some settings, but not in others. Thus far, only limited data have been available to inform clinical practice guidelines, and the optimum oxygenation target for ICU patients is uncertain. Because of the publication of new trial evidence, we have updated this review. Objectives To update the assessment of benefits and harms of higher versus lower fractions of inspired oxygen (FiO2) or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the ICU. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, and LILACS. We searched for ongoing or unpublished trials in clinical trial registers and scanned the reference lists and citations of included trials. Literature searches for this updated review were conducted in November 2022. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared higher versus lower FiO2 or targets of arterial oxygenation (partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), peripheral or arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2 or SaO2)) for adults admitted to the ICU. We included trials irrespective of publication type, publication status, and language. We excluded trials randomising participants to hypoxaemia (FiO2 below 0.21, SaO2/SpO2 below 80%, or PaO2 below 6 kPa) or to hyperbaric oxygen, and cross‐over trials and quasi‐randomised trials. Data collection and analysis Four review authors independently, and in pairs, screened the references identified in the literature searches and extracted the data. Our primary outcomes were all‐cause mortality, the proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events (SAEs), and quality of life. We analysed all outcomes at maximum follow‐up. Only three trials reported the proportion of participants with one or more SAEs as a composite outcome. However, most trials reported on events categorised as SAEs according to the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH‐GCP) criteria. We, therefore, conducted two analyses of the effect of higher versus lower oxygenation strategies using 1) the single SAE with the highest reported proportion in each trial, and 2) the cumulated proportion of participants with an SAE in each trial. Two trials reported on quality of life. Secondary outcomes were lung injury, myocardial infarction, stroke, and sepsis. No trial reported on lung injury as a composite outcome, but four trials reported on the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and five on pneumonia. We, therefore, conducted two analyses of the effect of higher versus lower oxygenation strategies using 1) the single lung injury event with the highest reported proportion in each trial, and 2) the cumulated proportion of participants with ARDS or pneumonia in each trial. We assessed the risk of systematic errors by evaluating the risk of bias in the included trials using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. We used the GRADEpro tool to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. We also evaluated the risk of publication bias for outcomes reported by 10b or more trials. Main results We included 19 RCTs (10,385 participants), of which 17 reported relevant outcomes for this review (10,248 participants). For all‐cause mortality, 10 trials were judged to be at overall low risk of bias, and six at overall high risk of bias. For the reported SAEs, 10 trials were judged to be at overall low risk of bias, and seven at overall high risk of bias. Two trials reported on quality of life, of which one was judged to be at overall low risk of bias and one at high risk of bias for this outcome. Meta‐analysis of all trials, regardless of risk of bias, indicated no significant difference from higher or lower oxygenation strategies at maximum follow‐up with regard to mortality (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (C)I 0.96 to 1.06; I2 = 14%; 16 trials; 9408 participants; very low‐certainty evidence); occurrence of SAEs: the highest proportion of any specific SAE in each trial RR 1.01 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.06; I2 = 36%; 9466 participants; 17 trials; very low‐certainty evidence), or quality of life (mean difference (MD) 0.5 points in participants assigned to higher oxygenation strategies (95% CI ‐2.75 to 1.75; I2 = 34%, 1649 participants; 2 trials; very low‐certainty evidence)). Meta‐analysis of the cumulated number of SAEs suggested benefit of a lower oxygenation strategy (RR 1.04 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.07; I2 = 74%; 9489 participants; 17 trials; very low certainty evidence)). However, trial sequential analyses, with correction for sparse data and repetitive testing, could reject a relative risk increase or reduction of 10% for mortality and the highest proportion of SAEs, and 20% for both the cumulated number of SAEs and quality of life. Given the very low‐certainty of evidence, it is necessary to interpret these findings with caution. Meta‐analysis of all trials indicated no statistically significant evidence of a difference between higher or lower oxygenation strategies on the occurrence of lung injuries at maximum follow‐up (the highest reported proportion of lung injury RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.38; I2 = 0%; 2048 participants; 8 trials; very low‐certainty evidence). Meta‐analysis of all trials indicated harm from higher oxygenation strategies as compared with lower on the occurrence of sepsis at maximum follow‐up (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.93; I2 = 0%; 752 participants; 3 trials; very low‐certainty evidence). Meta‐analysis indicated no differences regarding the occurrences of myocardial infarction or stroke. Authors' conclusions In adult ICU patients, it is still not possible to draw clear conclusions about the effects of higher versus lower oxygenation strategies on all‐cause mortality, SAEs, quality of life, lung injuries, myocardial infarction, stroke, and sepsis at maximum follow‐up. This is due to low or very low‐certainty evidence.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小麦发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
okkkkkkkkkkkkkk完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Sicily完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
wanci应助LIANG采纳,获得10
3秒前
王111发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
wjx关闭了wjx文献求助
9秒前
独特冰安发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
今后应助昵昵昵昵呀采纳,获得10
11秒前
MoPunk完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
13秒前
天天快乐应助YDX采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
无花果应助调皮初蝶采纳,获得10
17秒前
江夏清发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
新嗨发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
twotwomi发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
无恙发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
那小子真帅完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Owen应助江夏清采纳,获得10
25秒前
无情的访冬完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
YDX发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
29秒前
30秒前
wjx关闭了wjx文献求助
30秒前
32秒前
深情安青应助重要的如天采纳,获得10
32秒前
酷波er应助忧虑的绮梅采纳,获得10
33秒前
34秒前
wjx关闭了wjx文献求助
35秒前
Lliu完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
YOLO发布了新的文献求助30
35秒前
Enckson完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
热情迎彤发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3975375
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3519718
关于积分的说明 11199471
捐赠科研通 3256067
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798075
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877386
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806305