Is this to be another project that fizzles out? Using the i‐PARIHS framework to evaluate implementation of a mentoring programme

Abstract It is well‐known that the implementation of evidence into clinical practice is complex and challenging. The integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i‐PARIHS) framework conceptualizes successful implementation of evidence into practice. As the implementation of the mentoring programme proved to be a challenge, it seemed valuable to retrospectively study the implementation process using a framework like the i‐PARIHS. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate implementation of a multifaceted mentoring programme for bedside nurses using the i‐PARIHS framework, to identify factors that influenced the implementation. Design A secondary analysis of qualitative data using the i‐PARIHS framework as the theoretical lens. Method A directed content analysis was performed, driven theoretically by the i‐PARIHS framework. The analysis focused separately on (a) characteristics of the innovation and (b) successful and hindering factors in the implementation process. Results The results showed that successful factors influencing implementation of the mentoring programme included supportive and actively involved formal leaders and supervisors at the unit level. A major hindering factor was lack of resources in the form of personnel, time and money. A lack of facilitators, particularly experienced facilitators, throughout the organization hindered implementation. The i‐PARIHS framework offered a structured how‐to guide to identify factors that influenced the implementation process. Conclusion Implementation of the mentoring programme was a challenge for the organization. Investment into implementation should continue, with a more structured facilitation process. A structured and prioritized management system, including supportive leadership at the unit level, should be established by the hospital board. Implications for the profession There is a need for experienced facilitators throughout the organization. This is crucial to achieve sustainability in the mentoring programme and ensure that the large investments of staff resources and money do not fizzle out. Impact What problem did the study address? Implementing a mentoring programme for nurses in a large university hospital proved to be a challenge. Therefore, it seemed valuable to retrospectively study the implementation process using a framework like the i‐PARIHS. What were the main findings? A lack of facilitators, particularly experienced facilitators, throughout the organization hindered the implementation. The i‐PARIHS framework offered a structured how‐to guide to identify factors that influenced the implementation process. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Our findings are important for leaders on all levels in a hospital setting, including the hospital board, heads of departments and nurse managers. Reporting Method Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32‐item checklist for interviews and focus groups is used. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.