Detecting Artificial Intelligence-Generated Personal Statements in Professional Physical Therapist Education Program Applications: A Lexical Analysis

递归量化分析 个人计算机 心理学 人工智能 判别式 终结性评价 接收机工作特性 复杂度 决定论 计算机科学 社会心理学 自然语言处理 机器学习 形成性评价 数学教育 社会科学 物理 量子力学 非线性系统 社会学 计算机硬件
作者
John H. Hollman,Beth A. Cloud,David A. Krause,Darren Q. Calley
出处
期刊:Physical therapy [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:104 (4) 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzae006
摘要

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to compare the lexical sophistication of personal statements submitted by professional physical therapist education program applicants with those generated by OpenAI’s Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT). Methods Personal statements from 152 applicants and 20 generated by ChatGPT were collected, all in response to a standardized prompt. These statements were coded numerically, then analyzed with recurrence quantification analyses (RQAs). RQA indices including recurrence, determinism, max line, mean line, and entropy were compared with t-tests. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to examine discriminative validity of RQA indices to distinguish between ChatGPT and human-generated personal statements. Results ChatGPT-generated personal statements exhibited higher recurrence, determinism, mean line, and entropy values than did human-generated personal statements. The strongest discriminator was a 13.04% determinism rate, which differentiated ChatGPT from human-generated writing samples with 70% sensitivity and 91.4% specificity (positive likelihood ratio = 8.14). Personal statements with determinism rates exceeding 13% were 8 times more likely to have been ChatGPT than human generated. Conclusion Although RQA can distinguish artificial intelligence (AI)-generated text from human-generated text, it is not absolute. Thus, AI introduces additional challenges to the authenticity and utility of personal statements. Admissions committees along with organizations providing guidelines in professional physical therapist education program admissions should reevaluate the role of personal statements in applications. Impact As AI-driven chatbots like ChatGPT complicate the evaluation of personal statements, RQA emerges as a potential tool for admissions committees to detect AI-generated statements.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lichun发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
琉璃完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
朱斯彬发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
lxy66881发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
郭n发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
SYLH应助麦苗果果采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
乐乐应助犹豫的忆梅采纳,获得10
5秒前
快船总冠军完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
万能图书馆应助勤奋雅青采纳,获得10
7秒前
banegor发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
活力的之槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
朱斯彬完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
怕黑寒烟完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
大大大霖霖完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
琉璃发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小鹿发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
隐形曼青应助尤萨采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
蔡扬鹏发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
李健的小迷弟应助zhao采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研通AI2S应助郭n采纳,获得10
14秒前
bkagyin应助快去读文献采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
香蕉觅云应助清脆的又蓝采纳,获得30
16秒前
聪慧小燕发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
怕黑寒烟发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
爆米花应助bob采纳,获得10
16秒前
cocolu应助jessie采纳,获得100
18秒前
爱寻完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
脑洞疼应助余红采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
蔡扬鹏完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
中央政治學校研究部新政治月刊社出版之《新政治》(第二卷第四期) 1000
Hopemont Capacity Assessment Interview manual and scoring guide 1000
Classics in Total Synthesis IV: New Targets, Strategies, Methods 1000
Mantids of the euro-mediterranean area 600
【港理工学位论文】Telling the tale of health crisis response on social media : an exploration of narrative plot and commenters' co-narration 500
Mantodea of the World: Species Catalog Andrew M 500
Insecta 2. Blattodea, Mantodea, Isoptera, Grylloblattodea, Phasmatodea, Dermaptera and Embioptera 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 内科学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 基因 遗传学 化学工程 复合材料 免疫学 物理化学 细胞生物学 催化作用 病理
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3433940
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3031105
关于积分的说明 8940918
捐赠科研通 2719112
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1491653
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 689357
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 685523