Pediatric Mini-Invasive Splenectomy Comparing Laparoscopy With or Without Robotic Approach: A Single-Center Study

Background: The introduction of splenectomy in pediatric robotic surgery programs remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of robotic assisted splenectomy (RAS) in children and compare its outcomes with the laparoscopic splenectomy (LAS). Method: A single institution retrospective study was performed (2011-2020). We used the minimally invasive splenectomy score described by Giza et al. to measure the level of technical difficulty. The data collected for each procedure included its duration, the need for blood transfusion, complications, analgesic use, and the length of hospital stay. A standard univariate analysis is applied. Results: We recorded 41 cases (26 LAS and 15 RAS). The mean age was 11 years [7.00; 13.5]. The operating time was 97 minutes [85.5-108] for LAS and 223 minutes [190-280] for RAS (P < .001). The length of stay was 6.50 days [5.00-8.00] for LAS and 5 days [5.00-5.50] for RAS (P = .055). The cumulative use of level III analgesic was not statically different (P = .29). Two cases of difficult splenectomy were found in each group with comparable performances. In the RAS, we demonstrated the improved outcomes with the progression of the learning curve of a single surgeon. Conclusions: In our experience (as in the literature), RAS remains safe, but offers no additional advantage compared to laparoscopy as the cost and the operating time are higher. Our study has the advantages of having a 9 years long evolving experience, including broad indications in comparison to other pediatric studies.