医学
脊髓刺激
脊髓刺激器
刺激
硬膜外腔
铅(地质)
脊髓
麻醉
背
单盲板
临床试验
物理医学与康复
随机对照试验
外科
解剖
内科学
地质学
精神科
地貌学
作者
Abdulaziz Alsaif,Parikh Satym,Katherine Kim,Suzana Khalil,Arif Valliani,David Kim
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.neurom.2023.04.015
摘要
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used to treat chronic low back pain (LBP) since it was first proposed by Shealy et al. (1). SCS required placing electrodes in the posterior epidural space near the dorsal columns with electrical stimulation delivered at low-frequency 30-60 Hz (LFSCS) with concordant paresthesia elicited in the areas of pain (2). 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF10) was introduced and required no paresthesia mapping and used standardized reproducible epidural lead placement. Several studies have shown the clinical superiority of HF10 over LFSCS, including the two SENZA-RCTs(4,5). Since no paresthesia mapping is needed, we wanted to see if single lead trial would be comparable to standard dual lead trial.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI