特奈特普酶
溶栓
四分位间距
医学
心脏病学
纤溶剂
组织纤溶酶原激活剂
内科学
冲程(发动机)
血栓
置信区间
麻醉
心肌梗塞
机械工程
工程类
作者
Vignan Yogendrakumar,James Beharry,Леонид Чурилов,Lauren Pesavento,Khairuinnisa Alidin,Melissa Ugalde,Louise Weir,Peter Mitchell,Timothy Kleinig,Nawaf Yassi,Vincent Thijs,Teddy Y. Wu,Helen Brown,Helen M. Dewey,Tissa Wijeratne,Bernard Yan,Gagan Sharma,Patricia Desmond,Mark Parsons,Geoffrey A. Donnan,Stephen M. Davis,Bruce C.V. Campbell
出处
期刊:Neurology
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2024-04-09
卷期号:102 (7)
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1212/wnl.0000000000209166
摘要
Early treatment with intravenous alteplase increases the probability of lytic-induced reperfusion in large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients. The relationship of tenecteplase-induced reperfusion and the timing of thrombolytic administration has not been explored. In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of tenecteplase and alteplase reperfusion rates and assessed their relationship to the time of thrombolytic administration.Patients who were initially treated with a thrombolytic within 4.5 hours of symptom onset were pooled from the Royal Melbourne Stroke Registry, EXTEND-IA, EXTEND-IA TNK, and EXTEND-IA TNK part 2 trials. The primary outcome, thrombolytic-induced reperfusion, was defined as the absence of retrievable thrombus or >50% reperfusion at initial angiographic assessment (or repeat CT perfusion/angiography). We compared the treatment effect of tenecteplase and alteplase through fixed-effects Poisson regression modelling.Among 846 patients included in the primary analysis, early reperfusion was observed in 173 (20%) patients (tenecteplase: 98/470 [21%], onset-to-thrombolytic time: 132 minutes [interquartile range (IQR): 99-170], and thrombolytic-to-assessment time: 61 minutes [IQR: 39-96]; alteplase: 75/376 [19%], onset-to-thrombolytic time: 143 minutes [IQR: 105-180], thrombolytic-to-assessment time: 92 minutes [IQR: 63-144]). Earlier onset-to-thrombolytic administration times were associated with an increased probability of thrombolytic-induced reperfusion in patients treated with either tenecteplase (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.05 per 15 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.12] or alteplase (aRR 1.06 per 15 minutes [95% CI 1.00-1.13]). Tenecteplase remained associated with higher rates of reperfusion vs alteplase after adjustment for onset-to-thrombolytic time, occlusion site, thrombolytic-to-assessment time, and study as a fixed effect, (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.41 [95% CI 1.02-1.93]). No significant treatment-by-time interaction was observed (p = 0.87).In patients with LVO presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, earlier thrombolytic administration increased successful reperfusion rates. Compared with alteplase, tenecteplase was associated with a higher probability of lytic-induced reperfusion, independent of onset-to-lytic administration times.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02388061, NCT03340493.This study provides Class II evidence that among patients with LVO receiving a thrombolytic, reperfusion was more likely with tenecteplase than alteplase.