Fresh Versus Frozen Versus Lyophilized Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection

艰难梭菌 医学 粪便细菌疗法 粪便 微生物学 梭菌科 梭状芽胞杆菌感染 梭菌目 梭菌 细菌 抗生素 生物 遗传学 毒素
作者
Manesh Kumar Gangwani,Muhammad Aziz,Abeer Aziz,Fnu Priyanka,Simcha Weissman,Khiem Phan,Dushyant Singh Dahiya,Zohaib Ahmed,Amir Sohail,Wade Lee‐Smith,Faisal Kamal,Toseef Javaid,Ali Nawras,Benjamin Hart
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:57 (3): 239-245 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcg.0000000000001777
摘要

Introduction: Clostridium difficile Infection is a significant source of morbidity and mortality, which is on the rise. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is an alternative therapy to antibiotics with a high success rate and low relapse rate. Current data regarding the efficacy of the types of FMT used, namely fresh, frozen, and lyophilized is conflicting. Our review attempts to consolidate this data and highlight the most efficacious treatment currently available. Methodology: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SciELO, the Korean Citation Index, and Global Index Medicus were systematically searched from inception through May 3, 2022. Studies in which patients are undergoing any form of FMT who had failed antibiotic treatment previously were included. Both pairwise (direct) and network (direct + indirect) meta-analysis were performed using a random effects model and DerSimonian-Laird approach. A frequentist approach was used for network meta-analysis. Risk differences with (RD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results: A total of 8 studies, including 4 RCTs and 4 cohort studies, were included with a total of 616 patients. Fresh FMT was determined to be most successful with 93% efficacy 95% CI (0.913 to 0.999) followed by frozen with 88% efficacy 95% CI (0.857 to 0.947) and lyophilized with 83% efficacy 95% CI (0.745 to 0.910). The direct meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between fresh and frozen group. (RD −0.051 95% CI −0.116 to 0.014 P =0.178). No significant differences were noted in frozen versus lyophilized groups with an overall trend towards Fresh FM (RD −0.061 95% CI −0.038 to 0.160 P =0.617). On network meta-analysis, when compared with fresh group, a lower recovery rate was noted with both frozen group (RD −0.06 95% CI −0.11 to 0.00 P =0.05) and lyophilized group (RD −0.16 95% CI −0.27 to −0.05 P =0.01). Conclusion: We conclude the efficacy of Frozen and Lyophilized preparations is high with no difference in direct comparison, and the relative efficacy reduction based on network analysis is outweighed by the safety, accessibility, and practicality of Frozen or Lyophilized preparations.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
liyiren完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
qqqqqqy完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
alooof完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
黄毛虎完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
你在教我做事啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
自由的中蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
zombleq完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
先一完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
幽默尔蓝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
tian完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
罗氏集团发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
yirenli完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
眯眯眼的青文完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
风中的电脑完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
AATRAHASIS完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
lemon完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
zhao完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
duxh123完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
木瓜小五哥完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
甜甜圈完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
丸子完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
谢小盟完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
华仔应助xiaolang2004采纳,获得10
22秒前
磊磊完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
Hyacinth完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
清风完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
F少发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
下午好完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
terryok完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
franklylyly完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
所所应助摸鱼鱼采纳,获得10
28秒前
Smoiy完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
杨琴完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
健壮的思枫完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
求助完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
高分求助中
Aspects of Babylonian celestial divination : the lunar eclipse tablets of enuma anu enlil 1500
中央政治學校研究部新政治月刊社出版之《新政治》(第二卷第四期) 1000
Hopemont Capacity Assessment Interview manual and scoring guide 1000
Classics in Total Synthesis IV: New Targets, Strategies, Methods 1000
Mantids of the euro-mediterranean area 600
Mantodea of the World: Species Catalog Andrew M 500
Insecta 2. Blattodea, Mantodea, Isoptera, Grylloblattodea, Phasmatodea, Dermaptera and Embioptera 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 内科学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 基因 遗传学 化学工程 复合材料 免疫学 物理化学 细胞生物学 催化作用 病理
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3434871
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3032199
关于积分的说明 8944583
捐赠科研通 2720149
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1492192
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 689725
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 685877