Dentin exposure in tooth preparations for porcelain veneers: A pilot study

牙本质 搪瓷漆 材料科学 牙科 重复性 上颌中切牙 口腔正畸科 数学 复合材料 医学 统计
作者
George Cherukara,Graham Davis,Kevin Seymour,Lifong Zou,Dayananda Samarawickrama
出处
期刊:Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry [Elsevier]
卷期号:94 (5): 414-420 被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.016
摘要

Statement of problem The various clinical techniques available for even reduction of a tooth surface to receive a porcelain veneer restoration do not produce a consistently even conservative reduction. In addition, it is not known which technique is most conservative of enamel. Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of 3 clinical techniques, namely, dimple, depth groove, and freehand, in producing an intraenamel preparation. The relation between overpreparation beyond the commonly accepted depth of preparation of 0.5 mm and dentin exposure was also examined. Material and methods A single operator prepared 3 groups of 5 extracted maxillary central incisors to a depth of 0.5 mm using dimple, depth-groove, and freehand methods of tooth preparation. The prepared teeth were scanned using an x-ray microtomography scanner. The reconstructed images were studied using software that provided a volume-rendering routine so that, by choosing suitable x-ray linear attenuation coefficient thresholds, enamel (2.78 cm−1 at 40 keV) and dentin (1.63 cm−1 at 40 keV) surfaces could be viewed. The percentage area of enamel conserved was analyzed from these images. Coordinate metrology was used to produce color-coded images depicting the depth of preparation. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine the statistical significance (α=.05) in the difference between the mean percentage area of enamel conserved in the 3 technique groups. The coordinate metrology and x-ray microtomography images were visually compared to study the correlation between overpreparation and dentin exposure. Results The Kruskal-Wallis test did not demonstrate significant difference (P=.07) between the 3 techniques in conserving enamel. However, the dimple technique showed a greater trend to retaining a larger mean percentage area of enamel (77.5% ± 14.2) compared to depth-groove (50.1% ± 17.5) and freehand (76.8% ± 24.4) techniques. Preparation depth in the range of 0.4 to 0.6 mm was largely seen to be intraenamel, except in the cervical region. Conclusion Within the limitations of this pilot study, the 3 different techniques tested did not differ significantly in conserving enamel. The various clinical techniques available for even reduction of a tooth surface to receive a porcelain veneer restoration do not produce a consistently even conservative reduction. In addition, it is not known which technique is most conservative of enamel. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of 3 clinical techniques, namely, dimple, depth groove, and freehand, in producing an intraenamel preparation. The relation between overpreparation beyond the commonly accepted depth of preparation of 0.5 mm and dentin exposure was also examined. A single operator prepared 3 groups of 5 extracted maxillary central incisors to a depth of 0.5 mm using dimple, depth-groove, and freehand methods of tooth preparation. The prepared teeth were scanned using an x-ray microtomography scanner. The reconstructed images were studied using software that provided a volume-rendering routine so that, by choosing suitable x-ray linear attenuation coefficient thresholds, enamel (2.78 cm−1 at 40 keV) and dentin (1.63 cm−1 at 40 keV) surfaces could be viewed. The percentage area of enamel conserved was analyzed from these images. Coordinate metrology was used to produce color-coded images depicting the depth of preparation. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine the statistical significance (α=.05) in the difference between the mean percentage area of enamel conserved in the 3 technique groups. The coordinate metrology and x-ray microtomography images were visually compared to study the correlation between overpreparation and dentin exposure. The Kruskal-Wallis test did not demonstrate significant difference (P=.07) between the 3 techniques in conserving enamel. However, the dimple technique showed a greater trend to retaining a larger mean percentage area of enamel (77.5% ± 14.2) compared to depth-groove (50.1% ± 17.5) and freehand (76.8% ± 24.4) techniques. Preparation depth in the range of 0.4 to 0.6 mm was largely seen to be intraenamel, except in the cervical region. Within the limitations of this pilot study, the 3 different techniques tested did not differ significantly in conserving enamel.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
开朗方盒发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
无聊的人发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
搜集达人应助左白易采纳,获得10
3秒前
库昊的假粉丝应助海孩子采纳,获得30
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
lysixsixsix完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
未来可期发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
爆米花应助小鱼采纳,获得10
10秒前
不如一默发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
左白易发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Ruby发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
我是老大应助hu采纳,获得10
14秒前
斯文败类应助里已经采纳,获得10
19秒前
Ruby完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
21秒前
ele_anor完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
xjcy应助Kriemhild采纳,获得20
22秒前
22秒前
果果发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
鸣w完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
77完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
31秒前
ZZ给ZZ的求助进行了留言
34秒前
沉默的二娘完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
36秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
笋枭喘应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
37秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
37秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
37秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
37秒前
高分求助中
Earth System Geophysics 1000
Co-opetition under Endogenous Bargaining Power 666
Studies on the inheritance of some characters in rice Oryza sativa L 600
Medicina di laboratorio. Logica e patologia clinica 600
Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, 2nd Edition 500
Sarcolestes leedsi Lydekker, an ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of England 500
《关于整治突出dupin问题的实施意见》(厅字〔2019〕52号) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3212011
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2860865
关于积分的说明 8126364
捐赠科研通 2526752
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1360566
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 643243
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 615469