亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
SuiWu应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
26秒前
Marciu33应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
李加油完成签到,获得积分20
53秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
完美世界应助好德小饼干采纳,获得10
1分钟前
coolru完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
小嚣张完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
充电宝应助舒心的不二采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助30
4分钟前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
maclogos完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助30
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
威威发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
Fitz完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
威威完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
思源应助务实的犀牛采纳,获得10
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
bing完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
7分钟前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
7分钟前
bing发布了新的文献求助30
7分钟前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
小赖想睡觉完成签到,获得积分20
8分钟前
8分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6306883
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8123145
关于积分的说明 17014323
捐赠科研通 5365063
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2849273
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1826930
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1680245