Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wocao完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
卡卡发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
aa完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
昵称什么的不重要啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
甜筒完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
兴奋的问旋应助Li猪猪采纳,获得10
4秒前
钰c完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
心灵美的白易完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
勤劳冰烟完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
雨雾完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
斯文败类应助凶狠的乐巧采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
生言生语完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
alick发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
钰c发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Maggie完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
四月是一只爱猫的羊完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
打打应助嘟嘟请让一让采纳,获得10
10秒前
专一完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Lucas应助九川采纳,获得10
10秒前
yl关闭了yl文献求助
10秒前
11秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助韩莎莎采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
丘比特应助卡卡采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
毛毛发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
ljx完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
活力山蝶应助小白采纳,获得10
15秒前
xg完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Zezezee发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
笑点低可乐完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
坚强的樱发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
求解限发布了新的文献求助160
16秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527884
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108006
关于积分的说明 9287444
捐赠科研通 2805757
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540033
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716904
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709794