Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
mumu完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
211发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
coffeecat发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
西红柿发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
狂暴的蜗牛0713完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
xzz完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
有魅力的臻完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Ava应助harvey1989采纳,获得10
4秒前
碧蓝天晴完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
yongzaizhuigan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
xiaotian完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
wanci应助JIAN采纳,获得10
5秒前
猪猪侠发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
刘竹青发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
香蕉觅云应助快乐的大脚采纳,获得10
7秒前
疯狂的帆船关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助wwb采纳,获得10
8秒前
羽翼完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
英俊的铭应助自然绍辉采纳,获得10
8秒前
善良寄灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
明亮芙关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
李开心完成签到 ,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
赵睿智发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
在水一方应助mia采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
我嘞个逗应助珂颜堂AI采纳,获得10
12秒前
无限的热狗完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
郭杉发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
晶种分解过程与铝酸钠溶液混合强度关系的探讨 8888
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6421451
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8240508
关于积分的说明 17513073
捐赠科研通 5475321
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2892394
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1868805
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1706218