Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
yan完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
笨笨映寒完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
怡然的怀绿完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
NNi发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
刻苦棒球发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
疯子不风完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
mufeixue发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
刻苦棒球完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
黑色卡布奇诺完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
C1stues完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
20秒前
研小白应助张sir采纳,获得30
21秒前
研小白应助张sir采纳,获得30
21秒前
突突突发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
面汤完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
酷波er应助Wangwf采纳,获得10
23秒前
刘丰完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
NNi发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
z_king_d_23发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
hbsand完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
chenxilulu完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
️语完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
17835152738完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
黑山羊完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
1526完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
梅干菜鲜肉粽完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
murphy发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
哭泣凡阳应助达达采纳,获得10
38秒前
研友_zndy9Z完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
舒先生完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
murphy完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
糕糕完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
47秒前
NNi发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
moos完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
49秒前
英俊的铭应助kirin采纳,获得10
52秒前
SIHUONIANHUA发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
Photodetectors: From Ultraviolet to Infrared 500
On the Dragon Seas, a sailor's adventures in the far east 500
Yangtze Reminiscences. Some Notes And Recollections Of Service With The China Navigation Company Ltd., 1925-1939 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6355858
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8170527
关于积分的说明 17201202
捐赠科研通 5411774
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2864385
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1841922
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1690224