Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.3应助yiduo采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6.4应助yiduo采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6.1应助yiduo采纳,获得10
1秒前
GOD伟发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
叶绿体发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
笑笑完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
上官若男应助by采纳,获得10
3秒前
人参和醋发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助JJS采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
dildil发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
兴奋秋翠完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
小马甲应助明明采纳,获得10
4秒前
胡萝卜发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
喜欢玩王者荣耀应助nemo_yu采纳,获得10
6秒前
小咸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ZXB发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
Jasper应助mxy126354采纳,获得10
6秒前
ding应助二宝采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
Night发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
无聊的万天完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
dxtmm发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
马桶发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
深情安青应助无心的土豆采纳,获得10
8秒前
英俊的铭应助不安听露采纳,获得10
8秒前
凝枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
肖肖发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
萧瑟发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
领导范儿应助yiduo采纳,获得10
10秒前
慕青应助yiduo采纳,获得10
10秒前
追寻傲云发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
Overcoming Stigma and Bias in Obesity Management 800
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Materials selection in mechanical design 500
Bounds for Statistical Estimation in Semiparametric Models 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6479131
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8280484
关于积分的说明 17661154
捐赠科研通 5561688
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2911389
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1888380
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1742388