Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dingkuiyuan发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
wei完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
Orange应助橘子采纳,获得10
1秒前
Cyril完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
勤奋幻柏完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
YuLu发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
bububu发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
安静的明轩完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
正直的以冬完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
LL发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
赘婿应助挺帅一男的采纳,获得10
5秒前
hou发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
lyk2815完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
LYL完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
田様应助呵呵啊哈采纳,获得10
7秒前
温暖的寄云完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
重要冬日发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
牛初辰完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
zzer完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
ca完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
故渊丶发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
超级发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
AGU完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
彭于晏应助yuer采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
怡然的幻儿关注了科研通微信公众号
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
赵恩琪完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
王喆完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
15秒前
高兴树叶发布了新的文献求助20
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6041321
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7780744
关于积分的说明 16233982
捐赠科研通 5187337
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2775755
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1758873
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1642368