Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
所所应助苦瓜94采纳,获得10
1秒前
华仔应助berserker94采纳,获得10
1秒前
华仔应助berserker94采纳,获得30
1秒前
搜集达人应助berserker94采纳,获得30
1秒前
ruanruan发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
vvA11完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
baqiuzunzhe完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
上官若男应助gooooose采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
volunteer发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
天天快乐应助pretty采纳,获得10
8秒前
田様应助高源伯采纳,获得10
8秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
KLAY应助文艺问柳采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
科研通AI6.2应助zimuxinxin采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
liu发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
李hk发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
科研通AI6.1应助kk采纳,获得10
16秒前
脑洞疼应助嗷呜采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
后皇嘉树发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
暖若安阳完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
淡定友有完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
熊莉发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高源伯发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
苏苏完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
呆萌的孤云完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6011475
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7561281
关于积分的说明 16136985
捐赠科研通 5158233
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2762695
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1741467
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1633653