Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
机灵柚子应助锅包又采纳,获得20
2秒前
Ava应助典雅的念真采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
喜悦翠绿完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
molihuakai应助花花小丸子采纳,获得10
5秒前
李治博发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
下雨完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
賢様666发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
ye完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
CodeCraft应助RUINNNO采纳,获得10
7秒前
雪碧完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
舒心的柏柳完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
言烁发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
乐空思应助下雨采纳,获得30
10秒前
虚室生白完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
雪碧发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
白石溪发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
魏杨洋完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
洒松雪完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
hy完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
wanghq发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
多情豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
FashionBoy应助汎影采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6526177
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8319312
关于积分的说明 17806806
捐赠科研通 5627882
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2929577
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1906217
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1765849