Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
清爽的板凳关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
怡然夏槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
JacksonHe发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
佳佳应助墨薄凉采纳,获得10
5秒前
必毕业发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小二郎应助666采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Rachel完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
韩凡发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
李李完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Coraline应助GT采纳,获得10
10秒前
Dr大壮发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
fmwang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
666完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
18秒前
jia完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
NexusExplorer应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
19秒前
必毕业完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
1t完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
Eva完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Zeeki完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
潇洒的凝梦完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
酷波er应助小达采纳,获得10
28秒前
小王发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
31秒前
心系天下完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
小王完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
35秒前
琳琳完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
37秒前
shuo0976完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
wry完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
乙酰水杨酸完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3966147
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3511567
关于积分的说明 11158912
捐赠科研通 3246169
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1793309
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874321
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804343