Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents

医学 诊断试验中的似然比 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 超声科 阑尾炎 致盲 前瞻性队列研究 诊断准确性 普通外科 外科 内科学 临床试验
作者
Teruhiko Terasawa,C. Craig Blackmore,Stephen Bent,R. Jeffrey Kohlwes
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:141 (7): 537-537 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011
摘要

Background: Although clinicians commonly use computed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests remains unclear. Purpose: To review the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasonography in adults and adolescents with suspected acute appendicitis. Data Sources: The authors used MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, review articles, textbooks, and expert opinion to retrieve English- and non–English-language articles published from 1966 to December 2003. Study Selection: The authors included prospective studies evaluating computed tomography or ultrasonography followed by surgical confirmation or clinical follow-up in patients at least 14 years of age with suspected appendicitis. Data Extraction: One assessor (for non–English-language studies) or 2 assessors (for English-language studies) independently reviewed each article to abstract relevant study characteristics and results. Data Synthesis: Twelve computed tomography studies and 14 ultrasonography studies met inclusion criteria. Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95), a specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.93 to 0.96), a positive likelihood ratio of 13.3 (CI, 9.9 to 17.9), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 (CI, 0.07 to 0.12). Ultrasonography had an overall sensitivity of 0.86 (CI, 0.83 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (CI, 0.78 to 0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.8 (CI, 3.5 to 9.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19 (CI, 0.13 to 0.27). Verification bias and inappropriate blinding of reference standards were noted in all of the included studies. Limitations: The summary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy for both tests was limited by the small number of studies, heterogeneity among study samples, and poor methodologic quality in the original studies. Conclusions: Computed tomography is probably more accurate than ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Prospective studies that apply gold standard diagnostic testing to all study participants would more reliably estimate the true diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
bk2020113458发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
xiaokai发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
之坠完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
mobai发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
KK_ad完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
黄婷发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
橘子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
xiaokai完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
海贼学术发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
头头发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
ouleoule完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
balelalala发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
13秒前
bkagyin应助碧蓝亦玉采纳,获得10
13秒前
英俊的铭应助隐形樱桃采纳,获得10
13秒前
小强发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
情怀应助xiaokai采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
a_hu发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
阳光发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
hh完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Jasper应助找不到文献采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
cmuzf完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
缓慢思枫发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
胡昕跃发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6052990
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7869446
关于积分的说明 16276856
捐赠科研通 5198467
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2781408
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1764363
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1646062