粉煤灰
路基
阿太堡极限
环境科学
膨胀性粘土
石灰
火山灰
加州承载比
岩土工程
抗压强度
煤
水泥
水分
火山灰反应
渗滤液
含水量
废物管理
土壤水分
地质学
材料科学
硅酸盐水泥
冶金
复合材料
工程类
土壤科学
作者
Z. Zimar,Dilan Robert,Annan Zhou,Filippo Giustozzi,Sujeeva Setunge,Jayantha Kodikara
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114926
摘要
Expansive clays are found in many countries worldwide, and they exhibit inherent volume change during the seasonal moisture variation causing cracks, heaves, and damages to the overlying pavements. Chemical stabilisation is one of the most used approaches to treat the expansive clay subgrades. Cement, Lime and Fly ash are the most commonly used stabilisers, in which fly is cheaper and a by-product obtained from the coal power plant. This paper reviews fly ash stabilisation on various clay types, including low plasticity clays, high plasticity clays, silty clays, organic clays, and peats. The review begins with the properties of fly ash, followed by the characteristics of fly ash stabilised subgrades. The micro-level mechanism, physical, mechanical, and hydraulic characteristics of stabilised pavements are presented graphically for the Class C, and F fly ashes. The micro-level studies reveal that the pozzolanic reaction is stronger than the cation exchange during the fly ash stabilisation. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR) and resilient modulus (Mr) increased with the fly ash addition and curing time for most soft soils except peat clays. Based on the mechanical and hydraulic characteristics, using 15% class C fly ash with 7 days of curing is recommended for optimum performance. Although few research studies confirm that the leachate limit of stabilised soil is within the acceptable limit, further studies are required to investigate the uptake of heavy metals and other certain carcinogenic contaminants. This study will provide key information for researchers and Engineers on the selection of fly ash stabilisation measures for expansive subgrades.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI