Efficacy and safety of primary needle-knife fistulotomy in biliary cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 优势比 随机对照试验 胰腺炎 外科 前瞻性队列研究 内科学
作者
Hemant Mutneja,Abhishek Bhurwal,Bashar M. Attar,Ishaan Vohra,Emmanuel Palomera Tejeda,Siddarth Verma,Vivek Kumar,Melchor Demetria
出处
期刊:European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:33 (1S): e71-e77 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1097/meg.0000000000002238
摘要

We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of primary needle-knife fistulotomy (NFK) in biliary cannulation. An electronic bibliographic search of digital dissertation databases was performed from inception till March 2020. All prospective studies, including randomized trials evaluating the use of NFK as a primary cannulation technique in biliary cannulation, were analyzed. The primary outcome was a successful cannulation rate and the secondary outcomes were post-ERCP pancreatitis rate and overall post-ERCP complication rate. A total of four prospective studies, including three randomized trials, were included for the analysis. The pooled cannulation success rate for primary NFK was 95.7% (95% CI. 83.1–99.0, P < 0.001). When compared with standard wire-guided cannulation, the analysis did not show any difference between the two techniques in terms of cannulation success (OR, 3.59, 95% CI, 0.34–37.39; P = 0.28; low certainty of evidence). The overall rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis with primary NFK was 1.5 % (95% CI, 0.6–3.9, P < 0.001). When compared with conventional wire-guided technique, the odds of developing post-ERCP pancreatitis with NFK were 0.22 (95% CI, 0.04–1.04, P = 0.06; moderate certainty of evidence). To conclude, NKF seems to be an effective means of biliary cannulation in expert hands. Although it may be associated with a lower rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis, the current strength and quality of evidence to support its use as a primary cannulation strategy is low. It may be considered in ERCPs at higher risk of pancreatitis by experienced endoscopists.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
111完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
眯眯眼的元正关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
3秒前
科研狗完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
cc1777发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
lobster发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
JamesPei应助稳重的非笑采纳,获得10
7秒前
Jasper应助ocean采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
英俊的铭应助Alison采纳,获得10
9秒前
xyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
FashionBoy应助幺幺采纳,获得10
10秒前
anchor发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研通AI6.2应助Fly采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
ZYC007完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
LEEPLUM完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Lucas应助lyyy采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
aajhajkahna应助坚定的黑猫采纳,获得20
17秒前
Akim应助张张采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助LZY采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
怕孤独的问芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
传奇3应助anchor采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
ocean发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
空白发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
Zhang_Jt107发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
25秒前
康少发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
周周完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Health Psychology 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7596613
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9173005
关于积分的说明 19637727
捐赠科研通 7173800
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3268045
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432760
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2261245