结肠镜检查
医学
回顾性队列研究
金标准(测试)
克罗恩病
内窥镜检查
胃肠病学
卡帕
内科学
内部评级可靠性
限制
疾病
科恩卡帕
炎症性肠病
结直肠癌
癌症
计算机科学
哲学
工程类
机器学习
机械工程
置信区间
语言学
作者
Jeremy Adler,Sally J. Eder,Acham Gebremariam,Christopher J. Moran,Lee M. Bass,Jonathan Moses,Jeffery D. Lewis,Andrew A.M. Singer,Tina L Morhardt,Joseph A Picoraro,Vanessa Cardenas,George M. Zacur,Richard B. Colletti
出处
期刊:Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2021-12-29
卷期号:28 (10): 1537-1542
被引量:1
摘要
Abstract Background Endoscopic mucosal healing is the gold standard for evaluating Crohn’s disease (CD) treatment efficacy. Standard endoscopic indices are not routinely used in clinical practice, limiting the quality of retrospective research. A method for retrospectively quantifying mucosal activity from documentation is needed. We evaluated the simplified endoscopic mucosal assessment for CD (SEMA-CD) to determine if it can accurately quantify mucosal severity recorded in colonoscopy reports. Methods Pediatric patients with CD underwent colonoscopy that was video recorded and evaluated via Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) and SEMA-CD by central readers. Corresponding colonoscopy reports were de-identified. Central readers blinded to clinical history and video scoring were randomly assigned colonoscopy reports with and without images. The SEMA-CD was scored for each report. Correlation with video SES-CD and SEMA-CD were assessed with Spearman rho, inter-rater, and intrarater reliability with kappa statistics. Results Fifty-seven colonoscopy reports were read a total of 347 times. The simplified endoscopic mucosal assessment for CD without images correlated with both SES-CD and SEMA-CD from videos (rho = 0.82, P < .0001 for each). The addition of images provided similar correlation. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were 0.93 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusions The SEMA-CD applied to retrospective evaluation of colonoscopy reports accurately and reproducibly correlates with SES-CD and SEMA-CD of colonoscopy videos. The SEMA-CD for evaluating colonoscopy reports will enable quantifying mucosal healing in retrospective research. Having objective outcome data will enable higher-quality research to be conducted across multicenter collaboratives and in clinical registries. External validation is needed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI