Review of the Technical, Toxicological, and PKPD Considerations for Conducting Inhalation Toxicity Studies on Biologic Pharmaceuticals—The Outcome of a Cross-Industry Working Group Survey

医学 免疫原性 不利影响 吸入 药理学 重症监护医学 免疫学 抗体 解剖
作者
Alison Wolfreys,Jo Kilgour,A. D. Allen,Sherri Dudal,Mark C. Freke,David Jones,George Karantabias,Carsten Krantz,Simon Moore,Sidney Mukaratirwa,Mark Price,Jeffrey S. Tepper,Annick Cauvin,Scott Manetz,Ian Robinson
出处
期刊:Toxicologic Pathology [SAGE]
卷期号:49 (2): 261-285 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1177/0192623321988841
摘要

The inhaled route is still a relatively novel route for delivering biologics and poses additional challenges to those encountered with inhaled small molecules, further complicating the design and interpretation of toxicology studies. A working group formed to summarize the current knowledge of inhaled biologics across industry and to analyze data collated from an anonymized cross-industry survey comprising 12 inhaled biologic case studies (18 individual inhalation toxicity studies on monoclonal antibodies, fragment antibodies, domain antibodies, oligonucleotides, and proteins/peptides). The output of this working group provides valuable insights into the issues faced when conducting toxicology studies with inhaled biologics, including common technical considerations on aerosol generation, use of young and sexually mature nonhuman primates, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling, exposure and immunogenicity assessment, maximum dose setting, and no observed adverse effect levels determination. Although the current data set is too small to allow firm conclusions, testing of novel biologics remains an active area and is likely to remain so for molecules where delivery via the inhaled route is beneficial. In the future, it is hoped others will continue to share their experiences and build on the conclusions of this review to further improve our understanding of these complex issues and, ultimately, facilitate the safe introduction of inhaled biologics into clinical use.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
故渊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
byb完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
汉堡包应助白兰鸽采纳,获得10
5秒前
猪猪hero发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
ding应助xm采纳,获得10
6秒前
春秋发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
安安发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
勇敢的心发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
jixuchance发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
迟大猫应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
8秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Leon应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
8秒前
时来运转发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
迟大猫应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Kelsen’s Legacy: Legal Normativity, International Law and Democracy 1000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 3: Products and Risk Management 600
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 2: Term Structure Models 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3543260
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3120651
关于积分的说明 9343550
捐赠科研通 2818657
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1549757
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 722221
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 713078