Efficacy of a Web-Based, Crowdsourced Peer-To-Peer Cognitive Reappraisal Platform for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial

随机对照试验 同行支持 心理干预 万维网 损耗 萧条(经济学) 心理学 计算机科学 互联网隐私 医学 精神科 宏观经济学 外科 经济 牙科
作者
Robert R. Morris,Stephen M. Schueller,Rosalind W. Picard
出处
期刊:Journal of Medical Internet Research 卷期号:17 (3): e72-e72 被引量:184
标识
DOI:10.2196/jmir.4167
摘要

Background: Self-guided, Web-based interventions for depression show promising results but suffer from high attrition and low user engagement. Online peer support networks can be highly engaging, but they show mixed results and lack evidence-based content. Objective: Our aim was to introduce and evaluate a novel Web-based, peer-to-peer cognitive reappraisal platform designed to promote evidence-based techniques, with the hypotheses that (1) repeated use of the platform increases reappraisal and reduces depression and (2) that the social, crowdsourced interactions enhance engagement. Methods: Participants aged 18-35 were recruited online and were randomly assigned to the treatment group, "Panoply" (n=84), or an active control group, online expressive writing (n=82). Both are fully automated Web-based platforms. Participants were asked to use their assigned platform for a minimum of 25 minutes per week for 3 weeks. Both platforms involved posting descriptions of stressful thoughts and situations. Participants on the Panoply platform additionally received crowdsourced reappraisal support immediately after submitting a post (median response time=9 minutes). Panoply participants could also practice reappraising stressful situations submitted by other users. Online questionnaires administered at baseline and 3 weeks assessed depression symptoms, reappraisal, and perseverative thinking. Engagement was assessed through self-report measures, session data, and activity levels. Results: The Panoply platform produced significant improvements from pre to post for depression (P=.001), reappraisal (P<.001), and perseverative thinking (P<.001). The expressive writing platform yielded significant pre to post improvements for depression (P=.02) and perseverative thinking (P<.001), but not reappraisal (P=.45). The two groups did not diverge significantly at post-test on measures of depression or perseverative thinking, though Panoply users had significantly higher reappraisal scores (P=.02) than expressive writing. We also found significant group by treatment interactions. Individuals with elevated depression symptoms showed greater comparative benefit from Panoply for depression (P=.02) and perseverative thinking (P=.008). Individuals with baseline reappraisal deficits showed greater comparative benefit from Panoply for depression (P=.002) and perseverative thinking (P=.002). Changes in reappraisal mediated the effects of Panoply, but not the expressive writing platform, for both outcomes of depression (ab=-1.04, SE 0.58, 95% CI -2.67 to -.12) and perseverative thinking (ab=-1.02, SE 0.61, 95% CI -2.88 to -.20). Dropout rates were similar for the two platforms; however, Panoply yielded significantly more usage activity (P<.001) and significantly greater user experience scores (P<.001). Conclusions: Panoply engaged its users and was especially helpful for depressed individuals and for those who might ordinarily underutilize reappraisal techniques. Further investigation is needed to examine the long-term effects of such a platform and whether the benefits generalize to a more diverse population of users. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02302248; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02302248 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Wtkj6CXU).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
佰斯特威发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
俏皮诺言发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
afar完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
自然千山完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
rice0601完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
思源应助现实的行云采纳,获得10
6秒前
濮阳盼曼完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
后陡门的夏天完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
吾系渣渣辉完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
小小鱼发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
wxxz完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
蝃蝀发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
射天狼完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Vivid1224完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
t铁核桃1985完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
tuanheqi应助conanking采纳,获得200
19秒前
yuhaha完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
panda完成签到,获得积分0
20秒前
橙子完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
好名字完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
Jessie完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
磊磊完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
安静严青完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
文艺的初南完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
杨尚朋完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
yaocx完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
小青虫完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
LIUUU完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
小小鱼发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
缓慢的饼干完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
ZhihaoZhu完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
Nann完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
艳艳宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
蝃蝀完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
cocolu应助小小鱼采纳,获得10
41秒前
小奕完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
帆320完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
红领巾klj完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
lu发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
miao完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
高分求助中
Solution Manual for Strategic Compensation A Human Resource Management Approach 1200
Natural History of Mantodea 螳螂的自然史 1000
Glucuronolactone Market Outlook Report: Industry Size, Competition, Trends and Growth Opportunities by Region, YoY Forecasts from 2024 to 2031 800
A Photographic Guide to Mantis of China 常见螳螂野外识别手册 800
Autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise: linear versus a velocity-based flexible model 500
The analysis and solution of partial differential equations 400
Spatial Political Economy: Uneven Development and the Production of Nature in Chile 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3335504
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2964538
关于积分的说明 8614313
捐赠科研通 2643440
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1447485
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 670664
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 659032