医学
周围神经病变
模式
金标准(测试)
物理疗法
糖尿病神经病变
糖尿病足
糖尿病
神经传导
物理医学与康复
音叉
神经传导速度
内科学
内分泌学
振动
社会学
物理
量子力学
社会科学
作者
Stephanie Pleven,Νικόλαος Παπάνας,Alfred Gatt,Cynthia Formosa
标识
DOI:10.1177/15347346241295461
摘要
This study compared subjective screening modalities recommended in diabetic foot screening guidelines for the detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) with an objective measure, the NC-Stat DPNCheck ® . We assessed 63 participants (mean age 54.5 years ± 10.5) utilising subjective screening tools (Semmes-Weinstein 10-g monofilament, 128-Hz traditional tuning fork, neurothesiometer, O’Brien 128-Hz electronic tuning fork) and compared results with the objective automated sural nerve conduction test NC-Stat DPNCheck ® . A significant difference was found in the number of limbs classified with DPN between all screening tools ( P < .05). Therefore, this suggests that some screening modalities are more sensitive in diagnosing DPN than others, highlighting the importance of using multiple screening tools to a comprehensive understanding of the patient's neurological status. The findings also emphasize the need to incorporate objective measures in diabetic foot screening and encourage future research to establish a gold standard tool for DPN diagnosis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI