Cell-free fetal DNA testing performance and fetal fraction estimation are not affected in ART-conceived pregnancies

妊娠期 胎儿游离DNA 胎龄 医学 怀孕 产科 逻辑回归 胎儿 产前诊断 生物 遗传学 内科学
作者
Nuria Balaguer,Emilia Mateu-Brull,María Gómez-López,Carlos Simón,Miguel Milán
出处
期刊:Human Reproduction [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:37 (12): 2743-2756 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deac217
摘要

Does ART-based conception influence fetal fraction (FF) estimation and cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing performance?Mode of conception (ART versus natural) does not impact FF estimation or cffDNA test informativity rates.Pregnancies achieved via ART are increasing, and cffDNA testing is displacing traditional prenatal screening methods due to its high sensitivity and specificity and noninvasive nature. However, conflicting data exist on cffDNA testing performance and FF in ART pregnancies compared with natural pregnancies.We performed a case-control study that included 21 558 consecutive pregnancies (spontaneous, n = 15 707; ART, n = 5851). ART-conceived pregnancies were stratified into two groups according to oocyte origin. Samples were collected from April 2015 to September 2019.The study included women from different centers worldwide. Blood samples were drawn from the 10th week of gestation onward. Massive parallel whole-genome sequencing was used to analyze cffDNA content in blood plasma. Two different types of technologies (single-end and paired-end) were applied because of analysis technology changes made by the sequencing provider over time. FF was determined using different methods depending on the type of technology used. Cases with an FF <2% or with failure in any quality control metrics were classified as noninformative. An analysis of covariance model was selected to identify which qualitative (sequencing methodology, mode of conception, type (i.e. multiplicity) of gestation and age (women >35 or <35 years old)) and quantitative (gestational age, BMI) variables were predictors of FF value. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate whether the mode of conception impacted cffDNA testing performance.A univariate t-test demonstrated no significant differences in FF values between ART (median FF = 9.2%) and spontaneous pregnancies (median FF = 9.2%). Also, a multivariate analysis showed that the mode of conception, did not strongly impact the percentage of FF. ART-treated women showed a lower incidence of high-risk cffDNA results compared to women who conceived naturally, specifically for trisomy (T)21 (0.7% versus 1.3%, P = 0.001) and T18 (0.1% versus 0.3%, P = 0.001). A multivariate model stratified by type of aneuploidy suggested that these differences were conditioned by oocyte origin, especially for the T21 risk classification (P < 0.0001). False-positive rates (FPRs) were significantly higher in the ART population, mainly for T13 (P = 0.001) and sexual chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs; P < 0.001). A multivariate model suggested that the differences observed in SCAs were caused by sequencing modality rather than by mode of conception. Likewise, ART-treated women who used their own oocytes had a higher probability of a false positive for T13 (P = 0.004).Our study lacks follow-up data for low- and high-risk cases of both ART-conceived and naturally conceived pregnancies. Therefore, the results comparing FPR in both populations should be interpreted carefully. Also, collecting information about different ART modalities and regarding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy treatments would help draw definite explanations for the trends observed in this study.This is the first study that demonstrates, with a large sample size, that FF is not influenced by mode of conception, demystifying the notion that patients undergoing ART have a higher probability of noninformative cffDNA testing results. Multivariate models stratified by oocyte origin and type of aneuploidy demonstrated that ART-conceived pregnancies do not have a higher probability of classification as a high-risk pregnancy in prenatal testing. This information is especially valuable to clinicians and genetic counselors when informing patients about the risks and limitations of cffDNA testing in ART pregnancies.This study was financially supported by Igenomix Lab S.L.U. All authors declare no conflict of interest.N/A.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
小南孩完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
脑洞疼应助普鲁卡因采纳,获得10
9秒前
zhaoyaoshi完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
chiazy完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
智慧金刚完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
迪鸣完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
浪费青春传奇完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
少女徐必成完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
健壮的思枫完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
棱擎1号完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
tian发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
panpanliumin完成签到,获得积分0
20秒前
普鲁卡因发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
Keyuuu30完成签到,获得积分0
22秒前
22秒前
学者风范完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
进退须臾完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
图图发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
liujinjin完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
甜甜醉波完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
小不完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
小心薛了你完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
与离完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
感性的俊驰完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
疯狂的凡梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
桥豆麻袋完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
Hello应助幸福的杨小夕采纳,获得10
40秒前
Lighten完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
lyj完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
成就茗完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
ZD完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
55秒前
英姑应助普鲁卡因采纳,获得10
58秒前
冰糕发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038112
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575788
关于积分的说明 11373801
捐赠科研通 3305604
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819255
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022