Superiority of a preparation‐related model for predicting inadequate bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A multicenter prospective study

医学 结肠镜检查 逻辑回归 置信区间 前瞻性队列研究 队列 肠道准备 泻药 队列研究 内科学 外科 结直肠癌 癌症
作者
Long Chen,Gui Ren,Hui Luo,Linhui Zhang,Limei Wang,Jianghai Zhao,Rongchun Zhang,Xiaoying Zhang,Xiaoyu Kang,Yanglin Pan
出处
期刊:Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Wiley]
卷期号:37 (12): 2297-2305 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1111/jgh.16010
摘要

Abstract Background and Aim Three models based on patient‐related factors have been developed to predict inadequate bowel preparation (BP). However, the performance of the models seems suboptimal. This study aimed to develop a novel preparation‐related model and compare it with the available patient‐related models. Methods Patients receiving standard BP were prospectively enrolled from five endoscopic centers. Patient‐related and preparation‐related factors for inadequate BP (defined by segmental Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score < 2) were identified by logistic regression. A preparation‐related model was derived and internally validated in 906 patients. The comparisons of models were assessed by discrimination and calibration. The preparation‐related model was also externally validated. Results Several patient‐related factors (male and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score ≥ 3) and preparation‐related factors (drinking‐to‐stool interval ≥ 3 h, preparation‐to‐colonoscopy interval ≥ 6 h, and poor rectal effluent) were found to be independently associated with inadequate BP (all P < 0.05). C ‐statistics was 0.81 for the preparation‐related model in the training cohort ( n = 604), significantly higher than three available patient‐based models (0.58–0.61). Similar results were observed in the validation cohort ( n = 302). Calibration curves showed close agreement in the preparation‐related model ( R 2 = 0.315 in the training cohort and 0.279 in the validation cohort). The preparation‐related model was externally validated in another 606 patients with C ‐index of 0.80. Conclusions A new preparation‐related model (consisting of drinking‐to‐stool interval ≥ 3 h, preparation‐to‐colonoscopy interval ≥ 6 h, and poor last rectal effluent) was developed and performed better than three available patient‐related models. This easy‐to‐use model may be a useful decision‐support tool on individualized plans in patients undergoing BP.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
悲凉的小蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
灿灿完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
汉堡包应助这小猪真帅采纳,获得10
2秒前
踏实秋莲完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
爆米花应助啊打发撒旦采纳,获得30
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
顾矜应助cindy采纳,获得10
3秒前
坦率的匪发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
Hedgehog发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
meng发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
炙热的易绿完成签到 ,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
CipherSage应助平常诗翠采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
虚度光阴完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
是小孙啊发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
tsenchanted发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
优美晓灵发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
彩虹小马发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Lucas应助emmaguo713采纳,获得30
8秒前
文艺鞋子发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
陈成完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
于于发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
贪玩发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
奥特曼完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
大猫发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Chen0710发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
传奇3应助zhao采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI6应助rixinsu采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助rixinsu采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 880
Stop Talking About Wellbeing: A Pragmatic Approach to Teacher Workload 800
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
3rd Edition Group Dynamics in Exercise and Sport Psychology New Perspectives Edited By Mark R. Beauchamp, Mark Eys Copyright 2025 600
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
Terminologia Embryologica 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5619076
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4703940
关于积分的说明 14924739
捐赠科研通 4759151
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2550347
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1513156
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1474401