Oncologic Outcome of the Extent of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Analysis

医学 前列腺切除术 前列腺癌 生化复发 解剖(医学) 淋巴结 荟萃分析 子群分析 危险系数 泌尿科 比例危险模型 断点群集区域 随机对照试验 肿瘤科 内科学 癌症 外科 置信区间 受体
作者
David E. Hinojosa-González,José Ignacio Nolazco,Gal Saffati,Shane Kronstedt,Jeffrey A. Jones,Dov Kadmon,Justin Badal,Jeremy Slawin
出处
期刊:European urology focus [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:10 (2): 234-241 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2024.01.002
摘要

Context Some authors propose extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer. However, recent evidence found no difference in biochemical recurrence (BCR). Objective To stratify and analyze available evidence on ePLND and its impact on BCR in patients with localized prostate cancer. Evidence acquisition We systematically reviewed the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies up to November 2023. We identified original articles that presented statistical comparisons through Cox regressions reported as hazard ratio (HR) or survival curve data reported as Kaplan-Meier curve differences in BCR in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and stratified by the extent of lymph node dissection for localized prostate cancer. Evidence synthesis We identified 12 studies, with two being randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The RCTs showed no benefit of ePLND with an HR of 1.03 ([0.92, 1.14], p = 0.61). A combined analysis with the ten retrospective studies revealed a notable reduction in BCR with an HR of 0.68 ([0.52, 0.88], p = 0.003). A subgroup analysis based on the extent of dissection demonstrated that studies focusing on the more conservative extended template of dissection did not show significant BCR benefit (HR 0.97 [0.72, 1.32], p = 0.86). In contrast, dissections that expanded the anatomical extent showed decreased BCR (HR 0.56 [0.41, 0.75], p < 0.0001). A Bayesian network analysis highlights significant differences in BCR reduction between different dissection approaches, indicating the potential benefits of specific dissection templates. Conclusions Available literature on the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection needs to be improved in quality and varying definitions of the ePLND template. Dissection of the common iliac nodes may be beneficial. Patient summary There is a potential benefit in removing more lymph nodes during radical prostatectomy. However, more research is needed to determine whether this strategy benefits certain patient groups.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
草莓奶冻完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Star101HP发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
涵Allen完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
张十四完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
彭于晏应助QH采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
Pronoia关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
4秒前
领导范儿应助鲤鱼雪曼采纳,获得10
4秒前
研友_LJpvdZ完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
徐徐完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
苏坡men完成签到 ,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
yiiy应助空白采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
丢丢银发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
在水一方应助LHW采纳,获得10
6秒前
思源应助宇文老九采纳,获得10
6秒前
张可完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
万能图书馆应助hanqing采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
豆本豆发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
桃了桃了完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
端庄亦巧发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
依克发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
Leeee完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
爆米花应助飘逸的花生采纳,获得30
10秒前
11秒前
NexusExplorer应助酥酥采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Digital and Social Media Marketing 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5969690
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7274172
关于积分的说明 15984424
捐赠科研通 5107051
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2742837
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1707974
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1621112