医学
柯布角
脊柱侧凸
支撑
物理疗法
随机对照试验
撑杆
心理干预
特发性脊柱侧凸
保守治疗
儿科
外科
机械工程
精神科
工程类
作者
Anastasios Charalampidis,Elias Diarbakerli,Marlene Dufvenberg,Kourosh Jalalpour,Acke Ohlin,Anna Aspberg Ahl,Hans Möller,Allan Abbott,Paul Gerdhem,Birgitta Öberg,Hans Tropp,Anna Grauers,Ylva Bodén,Mats Hoffsten,Per Näsman,Henrik Hedevik
出处
期刊:JAMA network open
[American Medical Association]
日期:2024-01-29
卷期号:7 (1): e2352492-e2352492
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52492
摘要
Importance Moderate-grade adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) may be treated with full-time bracing. For patients who reject full-time bracing, the effects of alternative, conservative interventions are unknown. Objective To determine whether self-mediated physical activity combined with either nighttime bracing (NB) or scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE) is superior to a control of physical activity alone (PA) in preventing Cobb angle progression in moderate-grade AIS. Design, Setting, and Participants The Conservative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (CONTRAIS) randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 10, 2013, through October 23, 2018, in 6 public hospitals across Sweden. Male and female children and adolescents aged 9 to 17 years with an AIS primary curve Cobb angle of 25° to 40°, apex T7 or caudal, and skeletal immaturity based on estimated remaining growth of at least 1 year were included in the study. Dates of analysis were from October 25, 2021, to January 28, 2023. Interventions Interventions included self-mediated physical activity in combination with either NB or SSE or PA (control). Patients with treatment failure were given the option to transition to a full-time brace until skeletal maturity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was curve progression of 6° or less (treatment success) or curve progression of more than 6° (treatment failure) seen on 2 consecutive posteroanterior standing radiographs compared with the inclusion radiograph before skeletal maturity. A secondary outcome of curve progression was the number of patients undergoing surgery up until 2 years after the primary outcome. Results The CONTRAIS study included 135 patients (45 in each of the 3 groups) with a mean (SD) age of 12.7 (1.4) years; 111 (82%) were female. Treatment success was seen in 34 of 45 patients (76%) in the NB group and in 24 of 45 patients (53%) in the PA group (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.6). The number needed to treat to prevent curve progression with NB was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.4-33.5). Treatment success occurred in 26 of 45 patients (58%) in the SSE group (OR for SE vs PA, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-2.8). Up to 2 years after the primary outcome time point, 9 patients in each of the 3 groups underwent surgery. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, treatment with NB prevented curve progression of more than 6° to a significantly higher extent than did PA, while SSE did not; in addition, allowing transition to full-time bracing after treatment failure resulted in similar surgical frequencies independent of initial treatment. These results suggest that NB may be an effective alternative intervention in patients rejecting full-time bracing. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01761305
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI