Evaluation of mobile applications focused on the care of patients with anxiety disorders: A systematic review in app stores in Brazil

焦虑 移动应用程序 人口 评定量表 心理学 医学 临床心理学 精神科 计算机科学 万维网 发展心理学 环境卫生
作者
Viviane Souza do Nascimento,Aline Teotonio Rodrigues,Inajara Rotta,Tácio de Mendonça Lima,Patrícia Melo Aguiar
出处
期刊:International Journal of Medical Informatics [Elsevier]
卷期号:175: 105087-105087 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105087
摘要

To identify and evaluate the quality of mobile apps available in Brazil focused on the care of patients with anxiety disorders. A comprehensive search was conducted until October 2021 on Play Store (Android) and Apple Store (iOS) in Brazil, using the terms "anxiety," "phobia," "panic attack," and "social phobia." Two independent authors identified the apps and performed data extraction and quality assessment using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the relationship between user star rating and the quality defined by the MARS instrument. A total of 3,278 potential apps were identified, of which 71 fully met the eligibility criteria. Most apps were made available on the Play Store (91.74%), in English (69.01%), and updated in the last two years (90.14%). Approximately half of the apps (50.70%) did not inform the developer's country and most of them did not report the user star rating (70.42%). The target population was indicated as free by most apps (85.92%), with generalized anxiety disorder being the most addressed disorder (74.65%), followed by panic disorder (33.80%). The three main purposes of the apps were education (83.10%), self-assessment (38.03%), and meditation/breathing (32.39%). Only 31 apps (43.66%) had acceptable quality (above 3.0) and the average total MARS quality score of 2.93 (2.20 to 3.90), with the functionality section receiving the highest score (3.90) and the lowest scoring sections being engagement (2.16). The apps that were rated stars by users (29.58%) showed a negative Pearson correlation (ρ = -0.100), evidencing a difference in the user's evaluation and that performed using the MARS instrument. Gaps in the quality of apps focused on the care of patients with anxiety disorders were evidenced since most were classified as having low quality through the MARS instrument. Thus, users are recommended to use these apps with caution.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Akim应助菜菜采纳,获得10
刚刚
活泼学生发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
3秒前
我是老大应助tingting采纳,获得10
4秒前
QQQQ发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
玲儿完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
hlbbb完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
喜悦忆枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
asd发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
13478404761完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
雪上一枝蒿完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
SciGPT应助搞怪烨伟采纳,获得10
14秒前
gggyyy发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
方大完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
典雅君浩完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
19秒前
19秒前
Flyzhang完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
刚子发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
21秒前
XD824发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
XS123发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
萧水白应助一二三木偶人采纳,获得10
26秒前
平淡雪枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
tingting发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
siyuyu完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
29秒前
不配.应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
不配.应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
31秒前
等待八宝粥完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
菜菜发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
墨竹完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
IAMXC发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
36秒前
高分求助中
The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Second Edition, 2024) 1050
Kinetics of the Esterification Between 2-[(4-hydroxybutoxy)carbonyl] Benzoic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol: Tetrabutyl Orthotitanate as Catalyst 1000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3140361
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2791107
关于积分的说明 7797976
捐赠科研通 2447576
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1301949
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626354
版权声明 601194