数字聚合酶链反应
液体活检
结直肠癌
克拉斯
肺癌
医学
肿瘤科
内科学
活检
肺
腺癌
癌症
病理
癌症研究
生物
聚合酶链反应
基因
遗传学
作者
Stefania Crucitta,Martina Ruglioni,Claudia Novi,Mascia Manganiello,Roberta Arici,Iacopo Petrini,Eleonora Pardini,Federico Cucchiara,Federica Marmorino,Chiara Cremolini,Stefano Fogli,Romano Danesi,Marzia Del Re
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2023.117239
摘要
Highly sensitive technologies are available for the molecular characterization of solid tumors, including digital PCR (dPCR). Liquid biopsy, based on the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), is often used to assess EGFR or RAS alterations in lung and colorectal cancers. Our study aimed to compare the results of two different dPCR platforms for the detection of mutations in cfDNA.Plasma samples from lung and colorectal cancer patients collected as per routine procedures have been tested. cfDNA Was extracted from plasma, and samples were screened on the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, BioRad) and solid dPCR QIAcuity (Qiagen).A total of 42 samples were analyzed, obtained from 20 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients carrying an EGFR or a KRAS mutation on tissue at diagnosis, and from 22 samples of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, 10 of which presenting a KRAS mutation. EGFR mutation detection was 58.8% for ddPCR and 100% for dPCR (κ = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.71), compared to tissue results. The detection rate for RAS mutations was 72.7% for ddPCR and 86.4% for dPCR (κ = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68), compared to tissue results.This study showed moderate agreement between dPCR and ddPCR. Sampling effect or threshold settings may potentially explain the differences in the cfDNA data between the two different platforms.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI