Comparison of Two Presbyopia-Correcting Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Study

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical results of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with sinusoidal design by comparing with a traditional trifocal IOL.Materials and Methods: A total of 79 patients undergoing uneventful microincisional cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of one of two types of trifocal IOLs, the Acriva Trinova IOL (VSY) or Acrysof IQ PanOptix IOL (Alcon), were enrolled in this prospective study.Visual and refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity (CS), and defocus curve were assessed at 3 months after surgery.Patient satisfaction and incidence of photic phenomena were also evaluated. Results:The number of patients/eyes were 48/96 in the Trinova group and 31/62 in the PanOptix group.There were no significant differences between the groups for monocular and binocular corrected/uncorrected distance or intermediate (at 60 cm) and near visual acuities (VA) postoperatively.The Trinova group had statistically significantly better intermediate VA at 80 cm than the PanOptix group (p<0.05).The CS results of both groups were within the normal limits.In the binocular defocus curve of both IOLs, we observed a peak of good VA at 0.0 diopters defocus and a useful wide range for intermediate distances.The incidence of photic phenomena in the Trinova group was lower at postoperative 1 month (p<0.05)but this difference disappeared at 3 months.A total of 47 patients (97.9%) in the Trinova group and 30 patients (96.7%) in the PanOptix group stated that they would recommend the same IOL.Conclusion: Both trifocal IOLs provide good visual quality outcomes and patient satisfaction.