Prevalence of chronic pain after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 慢性疼痛 荟萃分析 神经病理性疼痛 脊髓损伤 病因学 纳入和排除标准 梅德林 物理疗法 系统回顾 内科学 脊髓 麻醉 病理 精神科 替代医学 法学 政治学
作者
Christine Hunt,Rajat N. Moman,Ashley Peterson,Rachel B. Wilson,Stephen Covington,Rafid Mustafa,M. Hassan Murad,W. Michael Hooten
出处
期刊:Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine [BMJ]
卷期号:46 (4): 328-336 被引量:77
标识
DOI:10.1136/rapm-2020-101960
摘要

Background The reported prevalence of chronic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) varies widely due, in part, to differences in the taxonomy of chronic pain. A widely used classification system is available to describe subcategories of chronic pain in SCI, but the prevalence of chronic pain in SCI based on this system is unknown. Objective The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the prevalence of chronic pain after SCI based on the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) classification system. Evidence review A comprehensive search of databases from January 1980 to August 2019 was conducted. The risk of bias was assessed using a modified tool developed for uncontrolled studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess certainty in prevalence estimates. Findings A total of 1305 records were screened, and 37 studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of overall chronic pain was 68% (95% CI 63% to 73%). The pooled prevalence of neuropathic pain in 13 studies was 58% (95% CI 49% to 68%); the pooled prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in 11 studies was 56% (95% CI 41% to 70%); the pooled prevalence of visceral pain in 8 studies was 20% (95% CI 11% to 29%) and the pooled prevalence of nociceptive pain in 2 studies was 45% (95% CI 13% to 78%). Meta-regression of risk of bias (p=0.20), traumatic versus non-traumatic etiology of injury (p=0.59), and studies where pain was a primary outcome (p=0.32) demonstrated that these factors were not significant moderators of heterogeneity. Certainty in prevalence estimates was judged to be low due to unexplained heterogeneity. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis extends the findings of previous studies by reporting the prevalence of chronic pain after SCI based on the ISCIP classification system, thereby reducing clinical heterogeneity in the reporting of pain prevalence related to SCI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI

祝大家在新的一年里科研腾飞
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研废物完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
tt完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
6秒前
小太阳发布了新的文献求助25
7秒前
8秒前
忆昔发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
惊蛰完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
zbq来完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
20秒前
英俊的友瑶完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
搜集达人应助亦萧采纳,获得10
22秒前
小蘑菇应助奕奕采纳,获得10
23秒前
YC发布了新的文献求助30
26秒前
忆昔完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
31秒前
小马甲应助lulu采纳,获得10
32秒前
33秒前
清脆的大开完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
35秒前
SUS发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
科研通AI2S应助姐姐采纳,获得10
36秒前
搜集达人应助zbq来采纳,获得10
37秒前
情怀应助YC采纳,获得30
37秒前
雨桃发布了新的文献求助30
38秒前
老六完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
40秒前
41秒前
lonely完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
48秒前
皮卡丘完成签到,获得积分20
48秒前
不安秋荷发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
脑洞疼应助junc采纳,获得10
51秒前
SUS完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
52秒前
53秒前
sss完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
高分求助中
Востребованный временем 2500
Aspects of Babylonian celestial divination: the lunar eclipse tablets of Enūma Anu Enlil 1000
Kidney Transplantation: Principles and Practice 1000
Separation and Purification of Oligochitosan Based on Precipitation with Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phosphate Anion, Re-Dissolution, and Re-Precipitation as the Hydrochloride Salt 500
The Restraining Hand: Captivity for Christ in China 500
Encyclopedia of Mental Health Reference Work 400
Mercury and Silver Mining in the Colonial Atlantic 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3375862
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2992254
关于积分的说明 8749935
捐赠科研通 2676510
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1466124
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 678131
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 669801