医学
间歇训练
高强度间歇训练
置信区间
随机对照试验
不利影响
持续培训
心脏病学
最大VO2
内科学
强度(物理)
物理疗法
心率
血压
量子力学
物理
作者
Ignacio Moreno-Suarez,Anna Scheer,Kaitlyn Lam,L. Dembo,Angela L. Spence,Chris Hayward,David M. Kaye,Angela Leet,Louise Fuller,Angela Jacques,Louise H. Naylor,Daniel J. Green,Andrew Maiorana
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2020.08.005
摘要
BACKGROUND Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is an established treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. To date, studies evaluating the impact of aerobic training in patients with LVADs have focused on moderate-intensity exercise. METHODS This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with those of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2 peak) in patients with LVADs. Secondary outcomes included 6-minute walk test distance, flow-mediated dilation, and anthropometry. Assessments were conducted at baseline and after 12 weeks of supervised training performed 3 times weekly. Participants were randomized to HIIT (4 sets of 4 minutes at 80%–90% V̇O2 reserve, alternating with 3 minutes at 50%–60% V̇O2 reserve) or MICT groups (28 minutes continuously at 50%–60% V̇O2 reserve). Within and between-group differences were analyzed using linear mixed models. Data are expressed as marginal means with 95% confidence intervals or as mean ± SD. RESULTS A total of 21 participants were randomized (HIIT: age 57.7 ± 13.1 years; n = 11 and MICT: age 55.6 ± 14.2 years; n = 10) (mean ± SD). No major adverse events occurred in response to training in either group. HIIT significantly improved V̇O2 peak (15.6 [13.2–17.8] to 18.4 [16.0–20.8] ml/kg/min) (marginal mean [95% CI]) compared with MICT (16.2 [13.8–18.7] to 17.2 [14.6–19.7] ml/kg/min; p < 0.05 between groups). No significant group differences were detected in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION In patients with LVADs, HIIT was well tolerated and increased aerobic capacity more than MICT. These preliminary findings support the prescription of high-intensity exercise in clinically stable patients with LVADs but warrant validation in a larger sample and across a broader range of physiologic and clinical outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au, unique identifier: ACTRN12616001596493. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is an established treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. To date, studies evaluating the impact of aerobic training in patients with LVADs have focused on moderate-intensity exercise. This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with those of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2 peak) in patients with LVADs. Secondary outcomes included 6-minute walk test distance, flow-mediated dilation, and anthropometry. Assessments were conducted at baseline and after 12 weeks of supervised training performed 3 times weekly. Participants were randomized to HIIT (4 sets of 4 minutes at 80%–90% V̇O2 reserve, alternating with 3 minutes at 50%–60% V̇O2 reserve) or MICT groups (28 minutes continuously at 50%–60% V̇O2 reserve). Within and between-group differences were analyzed using linear mixed models. Data are expressed as marginal means with 95% confidence intervals or as mean ± SD. A total of 21 participants were randomized (HIIT: age 57.7 ± 13.1 years; n = 11 and MICT: age 55.6 ± 14.2 years; n = 10) (mean ± SD). No major adverse events occurred in response to training in either group. HIIT significantly improved V̇O2 peak (15.6 [13.2–17.8] to 18.4 [16.0–20.8] ml/kg/min) (marginal mean [95% CI]) compared with MICT (16.2 [13.8–18.7] to 17.2 [14.6–19.7] ml/kg/min; p < 0.05 between groups). No significant group differences were detected in secondary outcomes. In patients with LVADs, HIIT was well tolerated and increased aerobic capacity more than MICT. These preliminary findings support the prescription of high-intensity exercise in clinically stable patients with LVADs but warrant validation in a larger sample and across a broader range of physiologic and clinical outcomes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI