Comparative Analysis of Patch Angioplasty Versus Selective Primary Closure during Carotid Endarterectomy Performed at a Single Vascular Center in China

医学 围手术期 血管外科 外科 结束语(心理学) 单中心 颈动脉内膜切除术 腹部外科 颈动脉 心脏外科 市场经济 经济
作者
Duan Liu,Zilun Li,Mian Wang,Ridong Wu,Jinsong Wang,Shenming Wang,Chen Yao,Guangqi Chang
出处
期刊:Annals of Vascular Surgery [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:73: 344-350 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.11.036
摘要

Background One of the ongoing debates about carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the closure technique of arterial wall in the operation. Current guidelines recommend routine patch closure (PAC); this recommendation is based on the evidence reported 10–20 years ago. Therefore, the exact role of PAC and primary closure (PRC) remains uncertain. The objectives of this study were to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent CEA with different closure techniques. Methods From January 2013 and December 2018, one senior vascular surgeon performed CEA for 126 patients in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. The closure technique (PAC or PRC) was determined on the characteristics (diameter and level) of carotid arteries. Patient demographics and clinical data were retrospectively collected by two research fellows by reviewing the hospital medical records and relevant radiologic studies, as were carotid duplex reports, indications, intraoperative data, closure technique, and perioperative complications. Data of long-term outcomes were gathered by reviewing outpatient clinic visits and associated supplementary examinations. Results PRC was performed in 78 operations (61.9%), and PAC was performed in 48 operations (38.1%). There were no statistical differences in demographic and clinical data between the two groups. Carotid clamp time (P < 0.001) and operating time (P < 0.001) were significantly longer when performing PAC (P < 0.001), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly more when performing PAC than that of PRC (P < 0.001). The postoperative outcome and the follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the short-term and middle-term overall survival rate and restenosis-free survival rate between the two groups. Conclusions There are no differences in postoperative and middle-term outcomes between PAC and selective PRC, whereas PRC technique can save operation time and shorten the intraoperative carotid clamp time. PRC can be safely applied in patients with a greater than 5 mm internal carotid artery (ICA). One of the ongoing debates about carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the closure technique of arterial wall in the operation. Current guidelines recommend routine patch closure (PAC); this recommendation is based on the evidence reported 10–20 years ago. Therefore, the exact role of PAC and primary closure (PRC) remains uncertain. The objectives of this study were to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent CEA with different closure techniques. From January 2013 and December 2018, one senior vascular surgeon performed CEA for 126 patients in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. The closure technique (PAC or PRC) was determined on the characteristics (diameter and level) of carotid arteries. Patient demographics and clinical data were retrospectively collected by two research fellows by reviewing the hospital medical records and relevant radiologic studies, as were carotid duplex reports, indications, intraoperative data, closure technique, and perioperative complications. Data of long-term outcomes were gathered by reviewing outpatient clinic visits and associated supplementary examinations. PRC was performed in 78 operations (61.9%), and PAC was performed in 48 operations (38.1%). There were no statistical differences in demographic and clinical data between the two groups. Carotid clamp time (P < 0.001) and operating time (P < 0.001) were significantly longer when performing PAC (P < 0.001), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly more when performing PAC than that of PRC (P < 0.001). The postoperative outcome and the follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the short-term and middle-term overall survival rate and restenosis-free survival rate between the two groups. There are no differences in postoperative and middle-term outcomes between PAC and selective PRC, whereas PRC technique can save operation time and shorten the intraoperative carotid clamp time. PRC can be safely applied in patients with a greater than 5 mm internal carotid artery (ICA).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
优雅含莲完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
呜啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
lulu8809完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
二十五完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
romeo完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
kaka完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
Akim应助xialuoke采纳,获得10
6秒前
昏睡的蟠桃应助guoxingliu采纳,获得200
7秒前
慕容松完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
romeo发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
ss_hHe完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
zjcomposite完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
nn发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
css完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
1111完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
敏er好学完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
细腻的谷秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
独特的易形完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
yangyangyang完成签到,获得积分0
16秒前
yirenli完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
叶子完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
angel完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
正经大善人完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
动听的秋白完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
汉堡包应助biofresh采纳,获得30
22秒前
自然归尘完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
缓慢海蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
liyiren完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
zhaopeipei完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
27秒前
调皮的老王头完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
毅诚菌完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
昵称完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038201
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575940
关于积分的说明 11373987
捐赠科研通 3305747
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819274
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892662
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022