A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
上官若男应助yjh729采纳,获得10
1秒前
lily336699完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zph14204发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
wanci应助fyn采纳,获得10
2秒前
思源应助godblessyou采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
呆萌如容完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
冷艳招牌应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得80
6秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
lily336699发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
hute完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
稳重一寡发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Scrow完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
帅气鹭洋发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
汉堡包应助john163采纳,获得10
11秒前
ww发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
傲娇的觅翠完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
SOFT MATTER SERIES Volume 22 Soft Matter in Foods 1000
Zur lokalen Geoidbestimmung aus terrestrischen Messungen vertikaler Schweregradienten 1000
Storie e culture della televisione 500
Selected research on camelid physiology and nutrition 500
《2023南京市住宿行业发展报告》 500
Food Microbiology - An Introduction (5th Edition) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4883732
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4169161
关于积分的说明 12936110
捐赠科研通 3929503
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2156155
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1174556
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1079303