A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
清秀的月亮完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
香蕉大船发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
JamesPei应助合适的咖啡采纳,获得10
1秒前
是猪猪呀完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
didididm发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Ava应助芝士啵啵球采纳,获得10
4秒前
上官若男应助疯狂的雁荷采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
晓然发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
lejunia发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
明理楷瑞发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
边伯贤发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
dd完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
继续前行完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
万能图书馆应助sdzylx7采纳,获得20
6秒前
Wsh关闭了Wsh文献求助
7秒前
英姑应助于是采纳,获得30
7秒前
星辰大海应助是猪猪呀采纳,获得10
7秒前
英姑应助SJZ采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
饭胖胖完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
跳跳鱼完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
英姑应助明理楷瑞采纳,获得10
10秒前
木长发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
akihi发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
慕青应助大块吃肉采纳,获得10
12秒前
DMUXLW发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
夜願发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6019284
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7612630
关于积分的说明 16161700
捐赠科研通 5166992
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2765538
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1747327
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635555