A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
韦广阔发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
奥利奥完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
惊天大幂幂完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
负责的采文完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
博博完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小张医生完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
善学以致用应助佳佳528采纳,获得10
8秒前
闪闪星星完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Pan完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
面壁的章北海完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
琰sky完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
汪宇发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
酷炫的雪珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
灿灿发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
南亭完成签到,获得积分0
19秒前
江添盛望完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
su完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
乐乐应助zsir采纳,获得10
21秒前
852应助牛仔采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
杨小鸿发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
25秒前
26秒前
Vexolve完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
AKKK完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
科研猫完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
Haonan完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
dimples完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
尊敬的寄松完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
珑仔完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
wx2360ouc完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
FC完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
LY完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 2500
Human Embryology and Developmental Biology 7th Edition 2000
The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology 12th Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5742102
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5405928
关于积分的说明 15343995
捐赠科研通 4883565
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2625098
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1573960
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1530910