已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
24发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
4秒前
留胡子的霆完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
旧日完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
pp‘s发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
panyuru发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
15秒前
17秒前
笑点低不言完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
梨鬼发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
YAYING完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
linchen发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
黄油小花饼干应助996采纳,获得10
25秒前
梓沐完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
失眠的流沙完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
英俊的铭应助旧日采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
坦率的语芙完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
JINCHANG完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
上官若男应助悦耳青梦采纳,获得10
32秒前
明理以南完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
35秒前
36秒前
Joanna完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
wenqing发布了新的文献求助20
41秒前
41秒前
犹豫梦菡完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
共享精神应助Hu采纳,获得10
44秒前
45秒前
JHS发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
一二三四完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
小蘑菇应助含糊的盼旋采纳,获得10
47秒前
炙热的之双完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
51秒前
996完成签到,获得积分20
52秒前
鼻揩了转去应助JohnsonTse采纳,获得10
53秒前
科研通AI6.1应助JHS采纳,获得10
55秒前
55秒前
55秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6027245
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7675546
关于积分的说明 16184948
捐赠科研通 5174865
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2769039
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1752492
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1638233