A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xunmi完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
kk完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
2秒前
2秒前
ZG发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
康心完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
雪白凌翠发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
善学以致用应助陌路采纳,获得10
5秒前
yht发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
7秒前
振武校尉发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
忐忑的觅风完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
善学以致用应助ppjkq1采纳,获得10
7秒前
威武问枫完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
今后应助小达采纳,获得10
8秒前
GYJ发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
李彪完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
antares发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
简单的八宝粥完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
旺仔发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
涛涛刚刚发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
lyf关闭了lyf文献求助
12秒前
Princess完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
考研小白发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
sachula发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
antares发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
常大有发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
轻松夏之完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
有魅力强炫完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
AAkew发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
云峤发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
ZXB完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 2000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
晋绥日报合订本24册(影印本1986年)【1940年9月–1949年5月】 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6032901
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7724670
关于积分的说明 16202205
捐赠科研通 5179622
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2771911
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1755218
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1640103