清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
智者雨人完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
炳灿完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
谢陈完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
Mr.Ren完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
景代丝完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
arizaki7完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
zw完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
勤恳冰淇淋完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
孤独手机完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
NexusExplorer应助ssong采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
ssong发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
花花2024完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
ybwei2008_163完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
1437594843完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
Migue发布了新的文献求助50
3分钟前
3分钟前
盐植物完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
盐植物发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
fdpb完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
WBB完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
alex12259完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
桥西小河完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
Ryan完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
康康完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
fufu发布了新的文献求助30
5分钟前
铜豌豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
香菜张完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
萨尔莫斯完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
qq完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
drhwang完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
潇潇完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
8分钟前
8分钟前
隶书发布了新的文献求助30
8分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 生物化学 化学工程 物理 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6021519
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7632564
关于积分的说明 16166674
捐赠科研通 5169330
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2766347
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1749241
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1636445