A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
幸运星完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
传奇3应助苹果黄蜂采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI6.1应助INNE采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
酷波er应助123采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
阿宝完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
sdzylx7发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ainan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
懿懿发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
12秒前
去燕麦完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
DH完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
16秒前
Ava应助CMUSK采纳,获得20
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
YunZeng完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Lin完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
脑洞疼应助SHY采纳,获得10
23秒前
韩子云完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
bow完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
25秒前
微微发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
织安完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
rui发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
冬aa发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
爆米花应助韩子云采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
30秒前
Apricity发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
勤劳的白晴完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
MoMo发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
懒洋洋完成签到 ,获得积分20
31秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 40000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5749517
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5459212
关于积分的说明 15363842
捐赠科研通 4888951
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2628829
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1577110
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1533774