A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lz完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
年沙完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
DoIt完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
aaaaaa完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
091完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
小蘑菇噢噢噢完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
tramp应助Tin采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
黑钻完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
roselin26完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
xxxksk完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
Ava应助认真的蜜粉采纳,获得10
7秒前
善学以致用应助李欣华采纳,获得10
7秒前
blueblue完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
那些兔儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
yangy115完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
谢显龙完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
程伟为完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
积极废物完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
大意的乐菱完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
holy完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
无限的续完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
冰水完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
秋澄完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
北国雪未消完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
李欣华完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
SJT完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
阿尔法贝塔完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
sptyzl完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
Aiden完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
积极的中蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
大头完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
欧耶欧椰完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
haha完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
26秒前
山野桃饼完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
qingqing168完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
樱香音子完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
高分求助中
歯科矯正学 第7版(或第5版) 1004
Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential (第二版) 1000
Semiconductor Process Reliability in Practice 720
GROUP-THEORY AND POLARIZATION ALGEBRA 500
Mesopotamian divination texts : conversing with the gods : sources from the first millennium BCE 500
Days of Transition. The Parsi Death Rituals(2011) 500
The Heath Anthology of American Literature: Early Nineteenth Century 1800 - 1865 Vol. B 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3229804
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2877334
关于积分的说明 8198826
捐赠科研通 2544785
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1374645
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 647033
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 621851