亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
mkeale发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
18秒前
vanHaren完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
28秒前
30秒前
cheng发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
38秒前
坚定的小蘑菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
48秒前
科研通AI6.2应助cheng采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
随风完成签到 ,获得积分20
1分钟前
森林木完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
felyne应助青空采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
summer发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
yipmyonphu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
深情安青应助车哥爱学习采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
高大语蕊发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
2分钟前
2分钟前
香蕉觅云应助负责聪健采纳,获得50
2分钟前
隐形曼青应助liubing采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
www完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
CipherSage应助高大语蕊采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
liubing发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6012556
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7571161
关于积分的说明 16139192
捐赠科研通 5159616
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2763152
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1742433
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634031