A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
醉熏的丸子完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
scime发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
wanci应助Guoguocheng采纳,获得10
2秒前
赵一丁完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
吃鱼的猫发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
626发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
清风入梦完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
萧瑟处完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
汉堡包应助成就傲芙采纳,获得10
4秒前
过时的哑铃应助阿田超甜采纳,获得10
4秒前
planto完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
孤独靖柏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
缥缈幻柏完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
SciGPT应助欢呼芷雪采纳,获得10
6秒前
aweia完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
华仔应助zwenng采纳,获得10
7秒前
XLIN完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
缓慢的博发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
wcc发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
小义发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
DDD完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
孤独靖柏发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
pillowdamon完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
啵u完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
Jjj发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
lidm完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Terrorism and Power in Russia: The Empire of (In)security and the Remaking of Politics 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6045898
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7819827
关于积分的说明 16250020
捐赠科研通 5191307
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2777965
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1761036
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1644122