A risk score for postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine

恶心 呕吐 医学 术后恶心呕吐 麻醉 怀孕 接收机工作特性 剖宫产 内科学 遗传学 生物
作者
Howe‐Siang Tan,Mary Cooter,Ronald B. George,Ashraf S. Habib
出处
期刊:International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:44: 126-130 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.08.008
摘要

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting affects up to 80% of parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, but there is a lack of obstetric-specific risk-prediction models. We performed this study to identify postoperative nausea/vomiting risk factors in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery, formulate an obstetric-specific prediction model (Duke score), and compare its performance against the Apfel score.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials studying nausea/vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine. Potential risk factors for postoperative nausea/vomiting within 24 h of surgery with univariate associations with P ≤0.20 were considered for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. After identifying the final multivariable model, we derived our Duke score by assigning points to the selected factors. We then tested the association of the Duke and Apfel scores with postoperative nausea and vomiting, and compared the area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Analysis included 260 parturients, of whom 146 (56.2%) experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Non-smoking during pregnancy (OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.12 to 4.67], P=0.023), and history of postoperative nausea/vomiting after cesarean delivery and/or morning sickness (2.09 [1.12 to 3.91], P=0.021) were independent predictors of postoperative nausea/vomiting and included in the Duke score. Both Duke and Apfel scores trended linearly with postoperative nausea/vomiting risk (Duke P=0.001; Apfel P=0.049) and had comparable areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (Duke 0.63 [0.57 to 0.70]; Apfel 0.59 [0.52 to 0.65], P=0.155).

Conclusions

Both Duke and Apfel scores exhibited similar but poor predictive performance. Until better tools are developed, routine prophylactic anti-emetics appears to be a reasonable approach in this patient population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
mookie发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
zxd发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
ZCZD完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Danqing发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
liuzhanyu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
hha完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
悦耳指甲油完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI2S应助大胆诗云采纳,获得10
8秒前
Owen应助诺克萨斯采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
Hello应助冷艳的纸鹤采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
我是老大应助Arsenel采纳,获得10
9秒前
hi_traffic完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
大可发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
wzc发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
酷波er应助zxd采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
future发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
杭秋寒发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
eznesug完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
香蕉觅云应助陈品琪采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
zzuzll完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
LaTeXer应助1111111采纳,获得30
15秒前
飘逸焱完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5718285
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5251746
关于积分的说明 15285174
捐赠科研通 4868514
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2614220
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1564054
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1521548