Individual Choice for the Aspiration Thrombectomy Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

Objective

To compare clinical efficacy, safety and cost of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (ART) plus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) plus CDT for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Methods

This was a retrospective study. A total of 126 DVT patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-one patients were included in the ART group and sixty-five in the MAT group. Clinical parameters were used to compare the groups. Clinical outcomes, complications and various medical expenses were analyzed.

Results

Technical success rates were 100% in ART and MAT group. There was no significant difference in the rate of thrombus clearance (lysis grades II and III) between ART group (98.36%) and MAT group (100%) (P = 0.311). The incidence of venous damage was slightly higher in the MAT group (4.6%) than in the ART group (0%) (P = 0.245). The cost of the ART group ($8,291.7 ± 471.4) was significantly higher than that of the MAT group ($4,632.5 ± 441.7) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

ART and MAT appear similar with good clinical outcomes for acute iliofemoral DVT. MAT substantially lowers mean cost per patient compared to ART.