清洁剂
经皮失水
保湿霜
角质层
触觉知觉
缓冲
化妆品
感知
敏感皮肤
干燥
皮肤病科
医学
化学
材料科学
生物医学工程
外科
心理学
食品科学
复合材料
病理
神经科学
作者
Sebastian Hendrickx‐Rodriguez,Sophie Connétable,Barbara Lynch,Joseph L. Pace,Ross Bennett‐Kennett,Gustavo S. Luengo,Reinhold H. Dauskardt,Anne Potter
摘要
Abstract Objective To decode the feeling of skin tightness after application of a cosmetic product and how to soothe this discomfort. To pursue this aim, we considered the ingredient's effect on stratum corneum (SC) biomechanics to differentiate between consumers prone to tightness from those that are not and correlate these effects with mechanoreceptor activation. Methods In vivo clinical trials were used to assess the tightness perception dichotomy between groups of Caucasian women; in vitro experiments were used to measure the mechanical stresses induced in the SC after cleanser and moisturizer application; and in silico simulations were used to illustrate how the measured mechanical stresses in the SC result in the development of strains at the depth of cutaneous mechanoreceptors, triggering tightness perceptual responses. Results Before any cream application, women prone to tightness tend to have a more rigid SC than their less sensitive counterparts, however cleanser application increases SC stiffness in all women. Surprisingly, no correlation was found between tightness perception and hydration measurements by the Corneometer or barrier function, as evaluated by transepidermal water loss. Self‐declared tightness and dryness scores were strongly associated with a self‐described sensitive skin. After application of the optimized moisturizing formula, Osmoskin® containing natural waxes with good filming properties, consumers report a strong decrease in tightness and dryness perception. These results match with laboratory experiments where the cleanser was shown to increase SC drying stresses by 34%, while subsequent application of Osmoskin® decreased stresses by 48%. Finite element modelling, using experimental results as input, elucidates the differences in perception between the two groups of women. It makes clear that Osmoskin® changes the mechanical status of the SC, producing strains in underlying epidermis that activates multiple cutaneous mechano‐receptors at a level correlated with the self‐perceived comfort. Conclusion Integration of the in vivo, in vitro and in silico approaches provides a novel framework for fully understanding how skin tightness sensations form and propagate, and how these sensations can be alleviated through the design of an optimized moisturizer.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI