生物
粮食安全
持续性
多元化(营销策略)
生物技术
热情
农业多样化
自然资源经济学
许可证
基因组
农业
业务
遗传学
经济
政治学
基因
生态学
心理学
社会心理学
营销
法学
作者
Kevin V. Pixley,José Benjamin Falck‐Zepeda,Robert Paarlberg,Peter W.B. Phillips,Inez H. Slamet‐Loedin,Kanwarpal S. Dhugga,Hugo Campos,Neal Gutterson
出处
期刊:Nature Genetics
[Springer Nature]
日期:2022-04-01
卷期号:54 (4): 364-367
被引量:72
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41588-022-01046-7
摘要
Widespread enthusiasm about potential contributions of genome-edited crops to address climate change, food security, nutrition and health, environmental sustainability and diversification of agriculture is dampened by concerns about the associated risks. Analysis of the top seven risks of genome-edited crops finds that the scientific risks are comparable to those of accepted, past and current breeding methods, but failure to address regulatory, legal and trade framework, and the granting of social license, squanders the potential benefits.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI