A Comparison of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score and the National Early Warning Score in Non-ICU Patients With/Without Infection

预警得分 医学 败血症 急诊医学 队列 重症监护医学 回顾性队列研究 内科学
作者
Oliver Redfern,Gary B. Smith,David Prytherch,Paul Meredith,Matthew Inada-Kim,Paul E. Schmidt
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:46 (12): 1923-1933 被引量:73
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0000000000003359
摘要

Objectives: The Sepsis-3 task force recommended the quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment score for identifying patients with suspected infection who are at greater risk of poor outcomes, but many hospitals already use the National Early Warning Score to identify high-risk patients, irrespective of diagnosis. We sought to compare the performance of quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment and National Early Warning Score in hospitalized, non-ICU patients with and without an infection. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large U.K. General Hospital. Patients: Adults hospitalized between January 1, 2010, and February 1, 2016. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: We applied the quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment score and National Early Warning Score to 5,435,344 vital signs sets (241,996 hospital admissions). Patients were categorized as having no infection, primary infection, or secondary infection using International Classification of Diseases , 10th Edition codes. National Early Warning Score was significantly better at discriminating in-hospital mortality, irrespective of infection status (no infection, National Early Warning Score 0.831 [0.825–0.838] vs quick Sequential [Sepsis-Related] Organ Failure Assessment 0.688 [0.680–0.695]; primary infection, National Early Warning Score 0.805 [0.799–0.812] vs quick Sequential [Sepsis-Related] Organ Failure Assessment 0.677 [0.670–0.685]). Similarly, National Early Warning Score performed significantly better in all patient groups (all admissions, emergency medicine admissions, and emergency surgery admissions) for all outcomes studied. Overall, quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment performed no better, and often worse, in admissions with infection than without. Conclusions: The National Early Warning Score outperforms the quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment score, irrespective of infection status. These findings suggest that quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment should be reevaluated as the system of choice for identifying non-ICU patients with suspected infection who are at greater risk of poor outcome.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
尘烟发布了新的文献求助200
1秒前
风华正茂完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
阿白发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
顺心的妙晴应助璐宝采纳,获得10
5秒前
jiabaoyu发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
eeeee发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
芽芽发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
一口一个小朋友完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
霄宝发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
张潆心发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
妮妮完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
浅言完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
美好斓应助尘烟采纳,获得200
14秒前
华仔应助zyx采纳,获得10
15秒前
星辰大海应助阔达碧空采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
CipherSage应助可爱萨摩耶采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
dyx发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
huyi5151发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
.。。。发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
陈一mo发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
隐形曼青应助碧蓝的汽车采纳,获得10
21秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
24秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
いちばんやさしい生化学 500
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
A mandible of Pliosaurus brachyspondylus (Reptilia, Sauropterygia) from the Kimmeridgian of the Boulonnais (France) 300
Avialinguistics:The Study of Language for Aviation Purposes 270
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3686090
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3236609
关于积分的说明 9826744
捐赠科研通 2948430
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1616857
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 763938
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 738130