Effect of Depth of Sedation in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Repair on Postoperative Delirium

医学 谵妄 镇静 异丙酚 麻醉 随机对照试验 共病 外科 入射(几何) 髋部骨折 重症监护医学 内科学 光学 物理 骨质疏松症
作者
Frederick E. Sieber,Karin J. Neufeld,Allan Gottschalk,George E. Bigelow,Esther S. Oh,Paul Rosenberg,Simon C. Mears,Kerry J. Stewart,Jean-Pierre P. Ouanes,Mahmood Jaberi,Erik A. Hasenboehler,Tianjing Li,Nae‐Yuh Wang
出处
期刊:JAMA Surgery [American Medical Association]
卷期号:153 (11): 987-987 被引量:120
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2602
摘要

Importance

Postoperative delirium is the most common complication following major surgery in older patients. Intraoperative sedation levels are a possible modifiable risk factor for postoperative delirium.

Objective

To determine whether limiting sedation levels during spinal anesthesia reduces incident delirium overall.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This double-blind randomized clinical trial (A Strategy to Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Delirum in Elderly Patients [STRIDE]) was conducted from November 18, 2011, to May 19, 2016, at a single academic medical center and included a consecutive sample of older patients (≥65 years) who were undergoing nonelective hip fracture repair with spinal anesthesia and propofol sedation. Patients were excluded for preoperative delirium or severe dementia. Of 538 hip fractures screened, 225 patients (41.8%) were eligible, 10 (1.9%) declined participation, 15 (2.8%) became ineligible between the time of consent and surgery, and 200 (37.2%) were randomized. The follow-up included postoperative days 1 to 5 or until hospital discharge.

Interventions

Heavier (modified observer’s assessment of sedation score of 0-2) or lighter (observer’s assessment of sedation score of 3-5) propofol sedation levels intraoperatively.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Delirium on postoperative days 1 to 5 or until hospital discharge determined via consensus panel usingDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition, Text Revision) criteria. The incidence of delirium was compared between intervention groups with and without stratification by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).

Results

Of 200 participants, the mean (SD) age was 82 (8) years, 146 (73%) were women, 194 (97%) were white, and the mean (SD) CCI was 1.5 (1.8). One hundred participants each were randomized to receive lighter sedation levels or heavier sedation levels. A good separation of intraoperative sedation levels was confirmed by multiple indices. The overall incident delirium risk was 36.5% (n = 73) and 39% (n = 39) vs 34% (n = 34) in heavier and lighter sedation groups, respectively (P = .46). Intention-to-treat analyses indicated no statistically significant difference between groups in the risk of incident delirium (log-rank test χ2, 0.46;P = .46). However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, when stratified by CCI, sedation levels did effect the delirium risk (Pfor interaction = .04); in low comorbid states (CCI = 0), heavier vs lighter sedation levels doubled the risk of delirium (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1- 4.9). The level of sedation did not affect delirium risk with a CCI of more than 0.

Conclusions and Relevance

In the primary analysis, limiting the level of sedation provided no significant benefit in reducing incident delirium. However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, lighter sedation levels benefitted reducing postoperative delirium for persons with a CCI of 0.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00590707
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
www发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
4秒前
angelfern完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
Singularity应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
Phosphene应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
丁杰孟完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
zyj完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
海纳百川发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
酷酷龙猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
CABBAGE发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
木木夕完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
szc关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
三块石头发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
狂野的向松完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
我是老大应助www采纳,获得10
14秒前
上官若男应助风回安采纳,获得10
15秒前
狂野的向松关注了科研通微信公众号
16秒前
FashionBoy应助眯眯眼的电脑采纳,获得10
19秒前
24秒前
zhouxiaoyan完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
lzc完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
相信未来应助音游采纳,获得10
34秒前
tonyhuang完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
时行舒发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
36秒前
38秒前
出金多多发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
丘比特应助Yangpc采纳,获得10
40秒前
约三十完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
Cyber_relic完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
陶醉的雁风完成签到,获得积分20
43秒前
44秒前
充电宝应助phoebe采纳,获得10
44秒前
Owen应助hahaha采纳,获得10
48秒前
高分求助中
Handbook of Fuel Cells, 6 Volume Set 1666
求助这个网站里的问题集 1000
Floxuridine; Third Edition 1000
Tracking and Data Fusion: A Handbook of Algorithms 1000
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 800
消化器内視鏡関連の偶発症に関する第7回全国調査報告2019〜2021年までの3年間 500
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 内科学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 冶金 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2863884
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2469775
关于积分的说明 6697779
捐赠科研通 2160082
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1147582
版权声明 585263
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 563754