医学
沃马克
骨关节炎
针灸科
随机对照试验
物理疗法
样本量测定
生活质量(医疗保健)
不利影响
外科
内科学
替代医学
数学
统计
病理
护理部
作者
Lu‐Lu Lin,Yongting Li,Jian‐Feng Tu,Jing‐Wen Yang,Ning Sun,Shuai Zhang,Tianqi Wang,Guang‐Xia Shi,Yi Du,Jingjie Zhao,Da-Chang Xiong,Hai-Kun Hou,Cun‐Zhi Liu
标识
DOI:10.1177/0269215518790632
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture for pain relief and function improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis and to determine the feasibility of an eight-week acupuncture intervention. Design: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting: Three teaching hospitals in China. Subjects: Patients with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren grade II or III). Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to an eight-week (three sessions per week) intervention of either traditional Chinese acupuncture or sham acupuncture. Main measures: The primary outcome was response rate—the proportion of patients achieving score ⩾36% decrease in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function at week 8 compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes included pain, function and quality of life. Results: Of 42 patients randomized, 36 (85.7%) completed the study. There was no significant difference in response rate between the traditional Chinese acupuncture and control groups: 61.9% (13 of 21) versus 42.9% (9 of 21) achieved score ⩾36% decrease in WOMAC pain and function at week 8 ( P = 0.217). The sum of WOMAC pain and function scores at week 8 was 11.6 (9.1) in the traditional Chinese acupuncture group compared with 16.3 (10.9) in the control group ( P = 0.183). There was no significant difference between groups. Three adverse events were recorded and were classified as mild. Conclusion: It showed that three sessions per week acupuncture intervention of knee osteoarthritis was feasible and safe. No difference was observed between groups due to small sample size. Larger (sample size ⩾ 296) randomized controlled trials of this intervention appear justified.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI