Fractional flow reserve in patients with reduced ejection fraction

医学 射血分数 心脏病学 内科学 血运重建 心肌梗塞 部分流量储备 血管造影 冠状动脉疾病 狭窄 冲程(发动机) 流量(数学) 冠状动脉血流储备 冠状动脉造影 射血分数保留的心力衰竭 心力衰竭 工程类 机械工程
作者
Giuseppe Di Gioia,Bernard De Bruyne,Mariano Pellicano,Jozef Bartunek,I Colaiori,Antonella Fiordelisi,Grazia Canciello,Panagiotis Xaplanteris,Stephane Fournier,A Katbeh,Danilo Franco,M Kodeboina,Carmine Morisco,Frank Van Praet,Filip Casselman,Ivan Degrieck,Bernard Stockman,Marc Vanderheyden,Emanuele Barbato
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:41 (17): 1665-1672 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz571
摘要

Abstract Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been investigated in patients with reduced ejection fraction and associated coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the impact of FFR on the management strategies of these patients and related outcomes. Methods and results From 2002 to 2010, all consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% undergoing coronary angiography with ≥1 intermediate coronary stenosis [diameter stenosis (DS)% 50–70%] treated based on angiography (Angiography-guided group) or according to FFR (FFR-guided group) were screened for inclusion. In the FFR-guided group, 433 patients were matched with 866 contemporary patients of the Angiography-guided group. For outcome comparison, 617 control patients with LVEF >50% were included. After FFR, stenotic vessels per patient were significantly downgraded compared with the Angiography-guided group (1.43 ± 0.98 vs. 1.97 ± 0.84; P < 0.001). This was associated with lower revascularization rate (52% vs. 62%; P < 0.001) in the FFR-guided vs. the Angiography-guided group. All-cause death at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the FFR-guided as compared with Angiography-guided group [22% vs. 31%. HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.51–0.81); P < 0.001]. Similarly, rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke) was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group [40% vs. 46% in the Angiography-guided group. HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.67–0.97); P = 0.019]. Higher rates of death and MACCE were observed in patients with reduced LVEF compared with the control cohort. Conclusions In patients with reduced LVEF and CAD, FFR-guided revascularization was associated with lower rates of death and MACCE at 5 years as compared with the Angiography-guided strategy. This beneficial impact was observed in parallel with less coronary artery bypass grafting and more patients deferred to percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.3应助胡图图采纳,获得10
刚刚
小刘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
erik发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
CHRIS发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
烟花应助何必在乎采纳,获得10
1秒前
zgl发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
情怀应助景穆采纳,获得10
2秒前
my完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
SciGPT应助qvb采纳,获得10
2秒前
xixixi发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
无花果应助朱小毛采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
LB发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
饼饼完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
李爱国应助明明采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
打工肥仔应助iiiii采纳,获得10
3秒前
姜姜发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
烟花应助曹紫贤采纳,获得40
5秒前
百草园完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
响亮的用户G完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
结实的安露完成签到 ,获得积分20
6秒前
Cecily发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
A你发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
liam发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
充电宝应助柯柯采纳,获得10
7秒前
小南极发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
辑坤大王发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Gxy完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
顺利打开今日易开工完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
脑洞疼应助张大喵采纳,获得10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Terrorism and Power in Russia: The Empire of (In)security and the Remaking of Politics 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6046449
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7822003
关于积分的说明 16252048
捐赠科研通 5191875
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2778118
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1761278
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1644193