Fractional flow reserve in patients with reduced ejection fraction

医学 射血分数 心脏病学 内科学 血运重建 心肌梗塞 部分流量储备 血管造影 冠状动脉疾病 狭窄 冲程(发动机) 流量(数学) 冠状动脉血流储备 冠状动脉造影 射血分数保留的心力衰竭 心力衰竭 工程类 机械工程
作者
Giuseppe Di Gioia,Bernard De Bruyne,Mariano Pellicano,Jozef Bartunek,I Colaiori,Antonella Fiordelisi,Grazia Canciello,Panagiotis Xaplanteris,Stephane Fournier,A Katbeh,Danilo Franco,M Kodeboina,Carmine Morisco,Frank Van Praet,Filip Casselman,Ivan Degrieck,Bernard Stockman,Marc Vanderheyden,Emanuele Barbato
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:41 (17): 1665-1672 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz571
摘要

Abstract Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been investigated in patients with reduced ejection fraction and associated coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the impact of FFR on the management strategies of these patients and related outcomes. Methods and results From 2002 to 2010, all consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% undergoing coronary angiography with ≥1 intermediate coronary stenosis [diameter stenosis (DS)% 50–70%] treated based on angiography (Angiography-guided group) or according to FFR (FFR-guided group) were screened for inclusion. In the FFR-guided group, 433 patients were matched with 866 contemporary patients of the Angiography-guided group. For outcome comparison, 617 control patients with LVEF >50% were included. After FFR, stenotic vessels per patient were significantly downgraded compared with the Angiography-guided group (1.43 ± 0.98 vs. 1.97 ± 0.84; P < 0.001). This was associated with lower revascularization rate (52% vs. 62%; P < 0.001) in the FFR-guided vs. the Angiography-guided group. All-cause death at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the FFR-guided as compared with Angiography-guided group [22% vs. 31%. HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.51–0.81); P < 0.001]. Similarly, rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke) was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group [40% vs. 46% in the Angiography-guided group. HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.67–0.97); P = 0.019]. Higher rates of death and MACCE were observed in patients with reduced LVEF compared with the control cohort. Conclusions In patients with reduced LVEF and CAD, FFR-guided revascularization was associated with lower rates of death and MACCE at 5 years as compared with the Angiography-guided strategy. This beneficial impact was observed in parallel with less coronary artery bypass grafting and more patients deferred to percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
scahgjg关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
PP的应助被倒背如流圆周率采纳,获得30
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
飘逸的水蜜桃完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
5秒前
5秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
xuderui发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
江逾白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
window1000发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Uyz发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
sunny发布了新的文献求助200
6秒前
window1000发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
山川发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
春天的鱼发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
123的应助被jiujiu圆圆个采纳,获得10
10秒前
阿格发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
暖风嘿嘿发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
iris2333发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
李橙汁完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
无极微光的应助被阳光的紫丝采纳,获得20
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被投石问路采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
落后凝莲发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Louisa完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
zhengkai发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Hushluo发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea De Guyane 2000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Critical Bildung: Hegel and the Logic of Diremption 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8035587
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9472196
关于积分的说明 21257002
捐赠科研通 7605478
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3389886
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2521942
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2427243