Fractional flow reserve in patients with reduced ejection fraction

医学 射血分数 心脏病学 内科学 血运重建 心肌梗塞 部分流量储备 血管造影 冠状动脉疾病 狭窄 冲程(发动机) 流量(数学) 冠状动脉血流储备 冠状动脉造影 射血分数保留的心力衰竭 心力衰竭 工程类 机械工程
作者
Giuseppe Di Gioia,Bernard De Bruyne,Mariano Pellicano,Jozef Bartunek,I Colaiori,Antonella Fiordelisi,Grazia Canciello,Panagiotis Xaplanteris,Stephane Fournier,A Katbeh,Danilo Franco,M Kodeboina,Carmine Morisco,Frank Van Praet,Filip Casselman,Ivan Degrieck,Bernard Stockman,Marc Vanderheyden,Emanuele Barbato
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:41 (17): 1665-1672 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz571
摘要

Abstract Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been investigated in patients with reduced ejection fraction and associated coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the impact of FFR on the management strategies of these patients and related outcomes. Methods and results From 2002 to 2010, all consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% undergoing coronary angiography with ≥1 intermediate coronary stenosis [diameter stenosis (DS)% 50–70%] treated based on angiography (Angiography-guided group) or according to FFR (FFR-guided group) were screened for inclusion. In the FFR-guided group, 433 patients were matched with 866 contemporary patients of the Angiography-guided group. For outcome comparison, 617 control patients with LVEF >50% were included. After FFR, stenotic vessels per patient were significantly downgraded compared with the Angiography-guided group (1.43 ± 0.98 vs. 1.97 ± 0.84; P < 0.001). This was associated with lower revascularization rate (52% vs. 62%; P < 0.001) in the FFR-guided vs. the Angiography-guided group. All-cause death at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the FFR-guided as compared with Angiography-guided group [22% vs. 31%. HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.51–0.81); P < 0.001]. Similarly, rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke) was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group [40% vs. 46% in the Angiography-guided group. HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.67–0.97); P = 0.019]. Higher rates of death and MACCE were observed in patients with reduced LVEF compared with the control cohort. Conclusions In patients with reduced LVEF and CAD, FFR-guided revascularization was associated with lower rates of death and MACCE at 5 years as compared with the Angiography-guided strategy. This beneficial impact was observed in parallel with less coronary artery bypass grafting and more patients deferred to percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
科研通AI6.1应助leiyuekai采纳,获得10
1秒前
Daisy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
12138发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
戊烷发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ZZZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
马开峰完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
133完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小虎完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
Daisy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
mmyhn发布了新的文献求助50
6秒前
3321完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
NexusExplorer应助小年小少采纳,获得10
7秒前
魁梧的黑猫完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
龙叶静完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
耍酷鼠标完成签到 ,获得积分0
8秒前
Mingda发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
着急的沅完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
木木完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Shinewei发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Owen应助Siavy采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
zcq完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
小蘑菇应助xh采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
慕青应助木木采纳,获得10
13秒前
啊啊啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
龙傲天完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
hky完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
善学以致用应助WRWRWR采纳,获得10
17秒前
英勇源智完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Cora完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
呆呆发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 生物化学 化学工程 物理 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6022567
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7642904
关于积分的说明 16169707
捐赠科研通 5170857
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2766894
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1750200
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1636934