Fractional flow reserve in patients with reduced ejection fraction

医学 射血分数 心脏病学 内科学 血运重建 心肌梗塞 部分流量储备 血管造影 冠状动脉疾病 狭窄 冲程(发动机) 流量(数学) 冠状动脉血流储备 冠状动脉造影 射血分数保留的心力衰竭 心力衰竭 工程类 机械工程
作者
Giuseppe Di Gioia,Bernard De Bruyne,Mariano Pellicano,Jozef Bartunek,I Colaiori,Antonella Fiordelisi,Grazia Canciello,Panagiotis Xaplanteris,Stephane Fournier,A Katbeh,Danilo Franco,M Kodeboina,Carmine Morisco,Frank Van Praet,Filip Casselman,Ivan Degrieck,Bernard Stockman,Marc Vanderheyden,Emanuele Barbato
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:41 (17): 1665-1672 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz571
摘要

Abstract Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been investigated in patients with reduced ejection fraction and associated coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the impact of FFR on the management strategies of these patients and related outcomes. Methods and results From 2002 to 2010, all consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% undergoing coronary angiography with ≥1 intermediate coronary stenosis [diameter stenosis (DS)% 50–70%] treated based on angiography (Angiography-guided group) or according to FFR (FFR-guided group) were screened for inclusion. In the FFR-guided group, 433 patients were matched with 866 contemporary patients of the Angiography-guided group. For outcome comparison, 617 control patients with LVEF >50% were included. After FFR, stenotic vessels per patient were significantly downgraded compared with the Angiography-guided group (1.43 ± 0.98 vs. 1.97 ± 0.84; P < 0.001). This was associated with lower revascularization rate (52% vs. 62%; P < 0.001) in the FFR-guided vs. the Angiography-guided group. All-cause death at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the FFR-guided as compared with Angiography-guided group [22% vs. 31%. HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.51–0.81); P < 0.001]. Similarly, rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke) was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group [40% vs. 46% in the Angiography-guided group. HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.67–0.97); P = 0.019]. Higher rates of death and MACCE were observed in patients with reduced LVEF compared with the control cohort. Conclusions In patients with reduced LVEF and CAD, FFR-guided revascularization was associated with lower rates of death and MACCE at 5 years as compared with the Angiography-guided strategy. This beneficial impact was observed in parallel with less coronary artery bypass grafting and more patients deferred to percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
ASCK应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1秒前
jfkyt应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
合法合规发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
七省总督发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
Yang完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
XRH完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
小橘灯完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
华仔应助默默戎采纳,获得10
7秒前
小冰糖发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Nini完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
酷炫秋烟关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
鑫鑫完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
躺平行不行完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
传奇3应助boxi采纳,获得10
8秒前
不倦发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
天天开心发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
zhangyida完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科研通AI6.3应助懒人采纳,获得10
13秒前
星河完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7296139
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8914386
关于积分的说明 18875949
捐赠科研通 6962223
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3210381
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2379631
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2186702