Fractional flow reserve in patients with reduced ejection fraction

医学 射血分数 心脏病学 内科学 血运重建 心肌梗塞 部分流量储备 血管造影 冠状动脉疾病 狭窄 冲程(发动机) 流量(数学) 冠状动脉血流储备 冠状动脉造影 射血分数保留的心力衰竭 心力衰竭 工程类 机械工程
作者
Giuseppe Di Gioia,Bernard De Bruyne,Mariano Pellicano,Jozef Bartunek,I Colaiori,Antonella Fiordelisi,Grazia Canciello,Panagiotis Xaplanteris,Stephane Fournier,A Katbeh,Danilo Franco,M Kodeboina,Carmine Morisco,Frank Van Praet,Filip Casselman,Ivan Degrieck,Bernard Stockman,Marc Vanderheyden,Emanuele Barbato
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:41 (17): 1665-1672 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz571
摘要

Abstract Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been investigated in patients with reduced ejection fraction and associated coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the impact of FFR on the management strategies of these patients and related outcomes. Methods and results From 2002 to 2010, all consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% undergoing coronary angiography with ≥1 intermediate coronary stenosis [diameter stenosis (DS)% 50–70%] treated based on angiography (Angiography-guided group) or according to FFR (FFR-guided group) were screened for inclusion. In the FFR-guided group, 433 patients were matched with 866 contemporary patients of the Angiography-guided group. For outcome comparison, 617 control patients with LVEF >50% were included. After FFR, stenotic vessels per patient were significantly downgraded compared with the Angiography-guided group (1.43 ± 0.98 vs. 1.97 ± 0.84; P < 0.001). This was associated with lower revascularization rate (52% vs. 62%; P < 0.001) in the FFR-guided vs. the Angiography-guided group. All-cause death at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the FFR-guided as compared with Angiography-guided group [22% vs. 31%. HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.51–0.81); P < 0.001]. Similarly, rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke) was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group [40% vs. 46% in the Angiography-guided group. HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.67–0.97); P = 0.019]. Higher rates of death and MACCE were observed in patients with reduced LVEF compared with the control cohort. Conclusions In patients with reduced LVEF and CAD, FFR-guided revascularization was associated with lower rates of death and MACCE at 5 years as compared with the Angiography-guided strategy. This beneficial impact was observed in parallel with less coronary artery bypass grafting and more patients deferred to percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
程程发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
万能图书馆的应助被黎明之光采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
卡卡发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被Qiqi采纳,获得30
3秒前
3秒前
almos发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
bkagyin的应助被later采纳,获得10
4秒前
wxk完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
hxy90完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
直率的翎发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
Ava的应助被糖果不甜采纳,获得30
6秒前
Elsevier大王的应助被zyw0532采纳,获得30
7秒前
蛋蛋完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
hxy90发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
orixero的应助被hho采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
春天发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
爆米花的应助被Red采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
chendada发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
122完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
执着草丛发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
美丽的青易完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
华哥完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高高的咖啡豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
科研通AI2S的应助被wouwou采纳,获得10
13秒前
huang的应助被实验室采纳,获得10
13秒前
zhhyi1976完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
老隋发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea De Guyane 2000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Critical Bildung: Hegel and the Logic of Diremption 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8036041
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9472361
关于积分的说明 21258480
捐赠科研通 7605824
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3390018
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2521988
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2427312