Fractional flow reserve in patients with reduced ejection fraction

医学 射血分数 心脏病学 内科学 血运重建 心肌梗塞 部分流量储备 血管造影 冠状动脉疾病 狭窄 冲程(发动机) 流量(数学) 冠状动脉血流储备 冠状动脉造影 射血分数保留的心力衰竭 心力衰竭 工程类 机械工程
作者
Giuseppe Di Gioia,Bernard De Bruyne,Mariano Pellicano,Jozef Bartunek,I Colaiori,Antonella Fiordelisi,Grazia Canciello,Panagiotis Xaplanteris,Stephane Fournier,A Katbeh,Danilo Franco,M Kodeboina,Carmine Morisco,Frank Van Praet,Filip Casselman,Ivan Degrieck,Bernard Stockman,Marc Vanderheyden,Emanuele Barbato
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:41 (17): 1665-1672 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz571
摘要

Abstract Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been investigated in patients with reduced ejection fraction and associated coronary artery disease (CAD). We evaluated the impact of FFR on the management strategies of these patients and related outcomes. Methods and results From 2002 to 2010, all consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤50% undergoing coronary angiography with ≥1 intermediate coronary stenosis [diameter stenosis (DS)% 50–70%] treated based on angiography (Angiography-guided group) or according to FFR (FFR-guided group) were screened for inclusion. In the FFR-guided group, 433 patients were matched with 866 contemporary patients of the Angiography-guided group. For outcome comparison, 617 control patients with LVEF >50% were included. After FFR, stenotic vessels per patient were significantly downgraded compared with the Angiography-guided group (1.43 ± 0.98 vs. 1.97 ± 0.84; P < 0.001). This was associated with lower revascularization rate (52% vs. 62%; P < 0.001) in the FFR-guided vs. the Angiography-guided group. All-cause death at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the FFR-guided as compared with Angiography-guided group [22% vs. 31%. HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.51–0.81); P < 0.001]. Similarly, rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke) was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group [40% vs. 46% in the Angiography-guided group. HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.67–0.97); P = 0.019]. Higher rates of death and MACCE were observed in patients with reduced LVEF compared with the control cohort. Conclusions In patients with reduced LVEF and CAD, FFR-guided revascularization was associated with lower rates of death and MACCE at 5 years as compared with the Angiography-guided strategy. This beneficial impact was observed in parallel with less coronary artery bypass grafting and more patients deferred to percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
夏雪儿发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
臣子完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
Ditf完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
要减肥的鱼完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
老马发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
七听应助sssugar采纳,获得30
12秒前
汉堡包应助snow采纳,获得10
12秒前
super完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
传奇3应助流萤采纳,获得10
13秒前
思源应助ZetaGundam采纳,获得10
13秒前
桥豆麻袋发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
大模型应助蒋学金采纳,获得10
15秒前
sadsada发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
阿六完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
打打应助王明卓采纳,获得10
21秒前
Lucas应助sadsada采纳,获得50
22秒前
科研通AI6.2应助你好采纳,获得10
24秒前
orixero应助梅子黄时雨采纳,获得10
24秒前
lm18994782585发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
科研通AI6.2应助venti采纳,获得10
25秒前
顺利映菡发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
neu_zxy1991完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
wutong完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
孤独曲奇完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
cyy关闭了cyy文献求助
32秒前
32秒前
科研通AI6.2应助谭成勇采纳,获得10
32秒前
33秒前
蓝天白云发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
34秒前
若邻完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Cardiovascular Research and Medicine(2e) 820
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7781791
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9321417
关于积分的说明 20382975
捐赠科研通 7369678
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3320126
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2467955
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2336049