心理学
临床心理学
检查表
比例(比率)
饮食失调
价(化学)
可靠性(半导体)
心理测量学
饮食失调
应用心理学
认知心理学
量子力学
物理
功率(物理)
作者
Johanna Kling,Linda Kwakkenbos,Phillippa C. Diedrichs,Nichola Rumsey,Ann Frisén,Maria Piedade Brandão,Anabela G. Silva,Barbara Dooley,Rachel F. Rodgers,Amanda Fitzgerald
出处
期刊:Body Image
[Elsevier]
日期:2019-09-01
卷期号:30: 170-211
被引量:125
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.06.006
摘要
This systematic review synthesizes and critically appraises measurement properties of influential body image measures. Eight measures that met the definition of an assessment of body image (i.e., an individual's cognitive or affective evaluation of their body or appearance with a positive or negative valence), and scored high on systematic expert priority ranking, were included. These measures were: the Body Appreciation Scale (original BAS and BAS-2), the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults, the Body Shape Questionnaire, the Centre for Appearance Research Valence Scale, the Drive for Muscularity Scale, two subscales of the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, one subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory 3, and two subscales of the Multidimensional Body Relations Questionnaire. Articles assessing these scales' psychometric properties (N = 136) were evaluated for their methodological quality using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, and a best evidence synthesis was performed. The results supported the majority of measures in terms of reliability and validity; however, suitability varied across populations, and some measurement properties were insufficiently evaluated. The measures are discussed in detail, including recommendations for their future use in research and clinical practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI