Gender, Sense of Power, and Desire to Lead: Why Women Don’t “Lean In” to Apply to Leadership Groups That Are Majority-Male

心理学 功率(物理) 社会心理学 领导力 领导风格 量子力学 物理
作者
Rachael Goodwin,Samantha Dodson,Jacqueline M. Chen,Kristina A. Diekmann
出处
期刊:Psychology of Women Quarterly [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:44 (4): 468-487 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1177/0361684320939065
摘要

We investigated why women may have lower desires and intentions to apply to become a member of a leadership group (i.e., committee) than men when the majority of its members are men. In four studies, we examined the interaction between gender and gender composition of the leadership group on leader candidates’ sense of power, desire to lead, and intentions to apply to become a member of a leadership group. Informed by research on gender, perceived power, and the model of goal-directed behavior, we found that women, compared to men, expected lower sense of power when considering applying to a majority-male (vs. gender-balanced) online leadership committee (Study 1A, N = 294; Study 1B, N = 278). This pattern observed for women in majority-male leadership committees was not, however, evident for men in majority female leadership committees (Study 2, N = 560). Furthermore, women’s lower sense of power explained why they expressed lower desires to lead and intentions to apply for a majority-male leadership committee compared to men. Finally, we found that increasing women’s sense of power increased their desires and intentions to lead in a majority-male committee (Study 3, N = 460). We contribute to understanding why there still exists a discrepancy in the number of men versus women in leadership groups despite ongoing efforts to reduce it. We hope readers will apply these findings by identifying ways to increase women leader candidates’ sense of power in order to increase women’s representation on leadership committees and groups (e.g., boards). Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684320939065

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
张重复发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Su完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
莫妮卡完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
矮小的醉香完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
ss_hHe发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
小益完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
gyzzh完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
rocio应助ffliu采纳,获得10
4秒前
所所应助Yang_728采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
Wxs66完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
受伤菲音发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
7秒前
儒雅黄豆发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
7秒前
Lefting发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
YAN发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
深情安青应助阿龙采纳,获得10
9秒前
dxl完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
acceptddd发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
lelele发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
lllllll完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
蒋美桥发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
文剑武书生完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
鱼y完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
搜集达人应助张泽海采纳,获得10
14秒前
zuofighting发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
跳跃凌瑶发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
Yu发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
Tier 1 Checklists for Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings 1000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 1000
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 第六版习题答案 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6333054
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8149761
关于积分的说明 17107747
捐赠科研通 5388822
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2856801
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1834281
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1685299