Gender, Sense of Power, and Desire to Lead: Why Women Don’t “Lean In” to Apply to Leadership Groups That Are Majority-Male

心理学 功率(物理) 社会心理学 领导力 领导风格 量子力学 物理
作者
Rachael Goodwin,Samantha Dodson,Jacqueline M. Chen,Kristina A. Diekmann
出处
期刊:Psychology of Women Quarterly [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:44 (4): 468-487 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1177/0361684320939065
摘要

We investigated why women may have lower desires and intentions to apply to become a member of a leadership group (i.e., committee) than men when the majority of its members are men. In four studies, we examined the interaction between gender and gender composition of the leadership group on leader candidates’ sense of power, desire to lead, and intentions to apply to become a member of a leadership group. Informed by research on gender, perceived power, and the model of goal-directed behavior, we found that women, compared to men, expected lower sense of power when considering applying to a majority-male (vs. gender-balanced) online leadership committee (Study 1A, N = 294; Study 1B, N = 278). This pattern observed for women in majority-male leadership committees was not, however, evident for men in majority female leadership committees (Study 2, N = 560). Furthermore, women’s lower sense of power explained why they expressed lower desires to lead and intentions to apply for a majority-male leadership committee compared to men. Finally, we found that increasing women’s sense of power increased their desires and intentions to lead in a majority-male committee (Study 3, N = 460). We contribute to understanding why there still exists a discrepancy in the number of men versus women in leadership groups despite ongoing efforts to reduce it. We hope readers will apply these findings by identifying ways to increase women leader candidates’ sense of power in order to increase women’s representation on leadership committees and groups (e.g., boards). Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684320939065

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
丘比特应助sp1cy采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
佰斯特威应助微笑妖妖采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
一一完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
kimikimi完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
大力的冬萱应助ysj采纳,获得20
2秒前
eri完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
Annie完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
JIna完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
故意的怜晴完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
大模型应助晶晶采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
田様应助苗条菠萝采纳,获得10
5秒前
eri发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
51新月发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
杨亲亲完成签到 ,获得积分20
6秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
典雅碧空发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
lightgo完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
上官若男应助Hebbe采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
lenz完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
文艺的青旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
狂野黑米完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
denzel3970完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
dew应助lightgo采纳,获得10
12秒前
刘真焊发布了新的文献求助20
12秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7501068
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9091437
关于积分的说明 19395761
捐赠科研通 7110712
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3250832
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2420241
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2236838