德诺苏马布
医学
外科
刮除术
骨科手术
骨巨细胞瘤
巨细胞
内科学
骨质疏松症
病理
作者
Shinji Tsukamoto,Andreas F. Mavrogenis,Piergiuseppe Tanzi,Giulio Leone,Giovanni Ciani,Alberto Righi,Manabu Akahane,Kanya Honoki,Yasuhito Tanaka,Davide María Donati,Costantino Errani
出处
期刊:Orthopedics
[SLACK, Inc.]
日期:2020-08-03
卷期号:43 (5): 284-291
被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.3928/01477447-20200721-03
摘要
There are conflicting reports regarding the outcome and effect of denosumab for distal radius giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). The authors performed this study to evaluate the behavior of distal radius GCTB in relation to the type of treatment and the administration of denosumab. The files of 72 patients with distal radius GCTB treated from 1984 to 2018 were reviewed. Fourteen patients were administered denosumab. Surgical treatment consisted of curettage (25 patients) or resection (47 patients) and allograft or vascularized fibular head graft reconstruction. Median follow-up was 63.1 months (interquartile range [IQR], 35.5–107.1 months). The authors evaluated local recurrences, metastasis, function, and complications. The local recurrence rate was 30.6% at a median of 14.0 months (IQR, 10–19 months), with no difference between curettage and resection. The local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the patients who received denosumab. The metastasis rate was 9.7% at a median of 41.0 months (IQR, 15–114 months), with no difference regarding denosumab administration. Function was significantly better in patients after curettage. The complication rate was 25%; vascularized fibular graft reconstruction was associated with fewer complications. This study found that denosumab increases the risk of local recurrence after curettage, function is better after curettage, and vascularized fibular graft is the optimal reconstruction after resection of distal radius GCTB. [ Orthopedics . 2020;43(5):284–291.]
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI