Multi-attribute decision making: An innovative method based on the dynamic credibility of experts

加权 可靠性 正确性 排名(信息检索) 计算机科学 数据挖掘 决策矩阵 层次分析法 数学 人工智能 运筹学 算法 医学 政治学 法学 放射科
作者
Zhigang Zhang,Xiao Hu,Zhao-Ting Liu,Lian Zhao
出处
期刊:Applied Mathematics and Computation [Elsevier]
卷期号:393: 125816-125816 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.amc.2020.125816
摘要

Multi-attribute decision making has become a topic of interest for scholars because it can comprehensively and effectively be used to make decisions in situations in which there are multiple homogeneous options. Attribute weighting is an important step and has a significant impact on decision-making, and the subjective weighting method is commonly used in reality. However, as experts have different knowledge, experiences, preferences and so on, the weights of attributes given by experts are subjective. So expert credibility affects the final weights, and the correctness of the weights calculated in this case cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, the dynamic expert credibility model (DECM) is proposed. First, based on the decision matrix and the weight evaluation matrix, the method for calculating distance-based expert credibility calculates the distance between expert evaluations via the score deviation and ranking deviation. Second, considering the differences in the weight evaluation matrix caused by changes in the individual background of the experts, the expert background change process (EBCP) is proposed. Third, the dynamic value of credibility before and after the EBCP can be calculated. To prove the validity of the model, a test method is proposed from the perspective of data envelopment analysis. Finally, evaluations on industrial economic benefits of 16 provinces or municipalities in China are conducted to illustrate the applicability of the proposed model in practice. Using the test, DECM effectively eliminates the influence of the weight calculation due to expert credibility. After the EBCP, the target value of the DECM reaches 6.0989 and the validity of attribute weights is improved by 2.30%. Compared with the traditional weight determination method, the decision-making result under the DECM is consistent.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
科研通AI2S应助激动的煎饼采纳,获得10
1秒前
唧唧发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小二郎应助高高的故事采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
传奇3应助高高的故事采纳,获得10
4秒前
重重发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Lucas应助高高的故事采纳,获得10
4秒前
小马甲应助高高的故事采纳,获得10
5秒前
Hello应助高高的故事采纳,获得10
5秒前
小二郎应助高高的故事采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
小马甲应助高高的故事采纳,获得10
5秒前
Owen应助高高的故事采纳,获得10
5秒前
sifLiu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
冰月雪蝶发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
糖豆完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小黄人完成签到,获得积分0
7秒前
不安晓曼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
大个应助Thad采纳,获得10
9秒前
Rita发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
GLOVE发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
酷波er应助二二采纳,获得10
10秒前
MMMM发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
11秒前
star完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
Hilda007应助醒醒采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
MMMM完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
影逐光发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
汤mou发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
科研通AI6.3应助xin采纳,获得10
22秒前
高分求助中
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6010026
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7553080
关于积分的说明 16132422
捐赠科研通 5156678
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2762007
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1740482
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1633335