热感觉
热舒适性
瞬态(计算机编程)
热的
环境科学
冬季
模拟
汽车工程
点(几何)
工作温度
计算机科学
气象学
工程类
数学
物理
地质学
操作系统
气候学
几何学
作者
Paul Dancă,Florin Bode,Amina Meslem,Cristiana Croitoru,Mihnea Sandu,Ilinca Năstase,Cătălin Lungu,Loretta Batali
标识
DOI:10.1080/23744731.2021.1911157
摘要
Thermal comfort evaluation for vehicle occupants is very complicated due to the transient nature and non-uniformity of the vehicle interior.The thermal sensation of an automobile occupant is affected by the surrounding environment.Furthermore, the existing standard was developed for steady state and controlled conditions and it utilizes three evaluation indices, some of which are not adapted for this complex environment.In this article, the three standardized indices are compared in terms of thermal comfort, for a passenger vehicle in summer season.The results show that the mean values of the PMV/PPD model calculated at a single point with Comfort Sense equipment are far from the TSV mean values which were collected in questionnaires, while the teq index which was calculated with an advanced thermal manikin are closer to the TSV comfort votes.This may be explained by the fact that the TSV and teq consider the sensation for each body part at the local level.For a correct evaluation of the thermal comfort in non-uniform and transient environments like in vehicles, it is not enough to measure a single point.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI