Neo-/adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense (idd) treatment with EnPC to tailored dose-dense (dt) therapy with dtEC-dtD for patients with high-risk early breast cancer: Results on pathological complete response (pCR) for patients treated within the neoadjuvant setting.
Volker Moebus,S Noeding,Ekkehart Ladda,Peter Klare,Marcus Schmidt,Andreas Schneeweiß,Wolfgang Janni,Frederik Marmé,Toralf Reimer,Sabine Schmatloch,Elmar Stickeler,Michael Untch,Bruno V. Sinn,Volkmar Müller,Peter A. Fasching,Gϋnter von Minckwitz,Jenny Furlanetto,Nicole Burchardi,Sibylle Loibl
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Oncology [American Society of Clinical Oncology] 日期:2018-05-20卷期号:36 (15_suppl): 568-568被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.568
摘要
568 Background: GAIN-2 compares the effectiveness and safety of a predefined idd regimen (EnPC) vs. a dd regimen with modification of single doses depending on individual hematological and non-hematological toxicities (dtEC-dtD) as neo-/adjuvant treatment for patients with high risk breast cancer (BC) (NCT01690702). Methods: Patients with high risk BC (HER2+; triple negative BC (TNBC); luminal B-like: ER and/or PgR+, HER2-, Ki67 > 20%, N+; luminal A-like: ≥4 N+) were randomized to receive either iddEnPC (epirubicin 150mg/m2 q2w, nab-Paclitaxel 330mg/m2 q2w, cyclophosphamide 2000mg/m2 q2w for 3 cycles each) or dtEC-dtD (epirubicin 60-100mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 450-1200mg/m2 q2w for 4 cycles followed by docetaxel 60-100mg/m2 q2w for 4 cycles). The primary objective of the trial is to compare the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) between the two arms. pCR rates in the breast per arm (ypT0) in the neoadjuvant cohort will be reported. Results: In total the GAIN-2 trial accrued 2887 patients. From 08/2016 to 07/2017 598 patients have been randomized in the neoadjuvant setting (EnPC n = 298; dtEC-dtD n = 300). Median age was 49 [range 20-69] years. Overall, 2.3% had bilateral tumors, 38.0% cT1, 52.7% cT2 and 9.3% cT3/4, 55.4% cN+; 62.9% G3; 88.0% had Ki67 > 20%; 17.6% had hormone-receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-, 1.7% luminal A ≥4 N+, 31.9% HR+/ HER2+, 13.7% HR-/HER2+ and 35.1% TNBC. In the modified intention-to-treat population (EnPC n = 291; dtEC-dtD n = 293) the pCR rates for iddEnPC vs dtEC-dtD were 53.6% vs 45.1% (corrected continuity Chi-Square p = 0.047). Overall, 34.8% of the patients had at least 1 severe adverse event (EnPC 38.3% vs dtEC-dtD 31.3%). Conclusion: The GAIN-2 trials shows a statistically significant difference in terms of pCR rates within the breast for patients with high-risk BC receiving iddEnPC compared to dtEC-dtD as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01690702.