医学
随机对照试验
预防性抗生素
优势比
置信区间
科克伦图书馆
结直肠外科
荟萃分析
抗生素
内科学
外科
腹部外科
生物
微生物学
作者
Sumanth Gandra,Anna Trett,Gerardo Alvarez‐Uria,Joseph S. Solomkin,Ramanan Laxminarayan
摘要
Abstract Objective Rising antibiotic resistance could reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics in preventing postoperative infections. We investigated trends in the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for 3 commonly performed surgical procedures—appendectomy, cesarean section, and colorectal surgery—and 1 invasive diagnostic procedure, transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases (through October 31, 2017) for randomized control trials (RCTs) that measured the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for 4 index procedures in preventing postoperative infections (surgical site infections [SSIs] following the 3 surgical procedures and a combination of urinary tract infections [UTIs] and sepsis following TRPB). Results Of 399 RCTs, 74 studies (9 appendectomy, 11 cesarean section, 39 colorectal surgery, and 15 TRPB) were included. Multilevel logistic regression models with random intercepts for each study showed no statistically significant increase in SSIs over time for appendectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per year, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–1.16; P =.57), cesarean section (aOR per year, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96–1.05; P =.80), and TRPB (aOR per year, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77–1.18; P =.67). However, there was a significant increase in SSIs proportion following colorectal surgery (aOR per year, 1.049; 95% CI, 1.03–1.07; P <.001). Conclusion The efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis agents in preventing SSIs following colorectal surgery has declined. Small number of RCTs and low infections rates limited our ability to assess true effect for simple appendectomy, cesarean section, or TRPB.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI