医学
怀孕
金标准(测试)
妊娠期
医学诊断
回顾性队列研究
性病学
产科
单变量分析
计分系统
类天疱疮
皮肤病科
妇科
内科学
病理
大疱性类天疱疮
多元分析
免疫学
抗体
生物
遗传学
作者
Fangyi Xie,Dawn Marie R. Davis,Farah Baban,Emma F. Johnson,Regan N. Theiler,Austin Todd,Sara Pruneddu,Jenny E. Murase,Julia‐Tatjana Maul,Christina M. Ambros‐Rudolph,Julia S. Lehman
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2023.01.027
摘要
Background
Pemphigoid gestationis (PG) and polymorphic eruption of pregnancy (PEP) may be similar morphologically but confer different maternal and fetal risks. Direct immunofluorescence is the gold standard test used to differentiate between the 2 diagnoses but is not always available. Objective
To develop and validate a clinical scoring system to differentiate PG from PEP. Methods
After developing a scoring system based on differentiating clinical factors reported in existing literature, we tested its diagnostic accuracy in a retrospective international multicenter validation study in collaboration with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology's Skin Diseases in Pregnancy Taskforce. Results
Nineteen pregnancies (16 patients) affected by PG and 39 pregnancies (39 patients) affected by PEP met inclusion criteria. PG had a mean score of 4.6 (SD, 2.5) and PEP had a mean score of −0.3 (SD, 2.0). The area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-1.00). Univariate analysis revealed that almost all criteria used in the scoring system were significantly different between the groups (P < .05), except for skip pregnancy and multiple gestations, which were then removed from the final scoring system. Limitations
Small retrospective study. Conclusion
The Pregnancy Dermatoses Clinical Scoring System may be useful to differentiate PG from PEP in resource-limited settings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI