Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Support a Carbohydrate-Restricted Nutrition Intervention in People with Type 2 Diabetes
Holly Willis,Stephen E. Asche,Amy L. McKenzie,Rebecca N. Adams,Caroline Roberts,Brittanie M. Volk,Shannon Krizka,Shaminie J. Athinarayanan,Alison R. Zoller,Richard M. Bergenstal
出处
期刊:Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics [Mary Ann Liebert] 日期:2024-11-11
Low- and very-low-carbohydrate eating patterns, including ketogenic eating, can reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has also been shown to improve glycemic outcomes, such as time in range (TIR; % time with glucose 70-180 mg/dL), more than blood glucose monitoring (BGM). CGM-guided nutrition interventions are sparse. The primary objective of this study was to compare differences in change in TIR when people with T2D used either CGM or BGM to guide dietary intake and medication management during a medically supervised ketogenic diet program (MSKDP) delivered via continuous remote care.