作者
Yael A. Leshem,Joanne R Chalmers,Christian Apfelbacher,Norito Katoh,L.A.A. Gerbens,Jochen Schmitt,Phyllis I. Spuls,Kim S Thomas,Laura Howells,Hywel C Williams,Eric L. Simpson,Katrina Abuabara,Jiyoung Ahn,Valéria Aoki,Christian Apfelbacher,Takahiro Arai,B.W.M. Arents,Maren Awici-Rasmussen,Arabella Baker,B K Bang,Lauren Baughman,Lisa A. Beck,Angela L. Bosma,Tim Burton,Vanessa Byrnes,Brian Calimlim,Korey Capozza,Jo Chalmers,Rajeev Chavda,Amy M. DeLozier,Aaron M. Drucker,Toshiya Ebata,Laurence Eichenfield,Carsten Flohr,Surina Frey,Masaki Futamura,Michaela Gabes,Susannah George,L.A.A. Gerbens,Erin E. Grinich,Kristin Grossouw,Laura Howells,Alan D. Irvine,Yoko Kataoka,Norito Katoh,Urs Kerkmann,Sandra Lawton,Dong Hun Lee,Yael A. Leshem,Astrid H. Lossius,Tomoko Maeda‐Chubachi,David J. Margolis,Takeshi Matsui,Stéphanie Merhand,Mami Murakami,Hiroyuki Murota,Takeshi Nakahara,Fabio P. Nunes,Yukihiro Ohya,Peck Y. Ong,Raquel Leão Orfali,Amy S. Paller,M. Redding,Catalina Rincón Pérez,Amanda Roberts,Natasha K Rogers,Jochen Schmitt,Neil H. Shear,Jonathan I. Silverberg,Eric L. Simpson,Jasvidner Singh,Wendy Smith Begolka,Phyllis I. Spuls,J.‐F. Stalder,Philip B. Sugerman,Åke Svensson,Kim S Thomas,Jacob P. Thyssen,Gail Todd,Floor van der Most,Karlijn van Halewijn,Helle Vestby,Christian Vestergaard,Annika Volke,Laura von Kobyletzki,Carl‐Fredrik Wahlgren,Elke Weißhaar,Hywel C Williams,Andreas Wollenberg,Yang Zhao
摘要
Measuring outcomes in clinical practice can aid patient care, quality improvement, and real-world evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Clinical Practice initiative is developing a list of validated, feasible instruments to measure atopic eczema in clinical care. Prior work identified symptoms and long-term control as the most important domains to measure in clinical practice. The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index (PO-SCORAD) were recommended by consensus to measure symptoms in clinical practice, but a need for instruments to measure itch intensity specifically was recognized. The HOME group also previously decided that long-term control should be captured by repeated measurements of eczema control. Recommended instruments to measure eczema control in clinical practice have not been defined.To recommend instruments to measure eczema control and itch intensity in patients with atopic eczema in clinical practice.Available instruments to measure eczema control and itch intensity were identified through systematic reviews, informing a consensus process held at the HOME VIII virtual online meeting (October 6 and October 9, 2020). Feasibility aspects were highlighted to optimize instrument selection for the clinical practice. Consensus on an instrument was reached if fewer than 30% of the voters disagreed.Of 7 identified instruments, the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) were the recommended instruments to measure eczema control (3 of 63 [5%] and 7 of 69 [10%] of voters disagreed, respectively). A single-question patient global assessment garnered support, but the current available instrument did not reach consensus. Six available itch-intensity instruments were identified. Of them, 3 instruments were recommended by consensus: a peak 24-hour numeric rating scale (NRS)-itch, and 1-week NRS-itch instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Itch Questionnaire, measuring average and peak itch (11 of 63 [17%], 14 of 63 [22%], and 16 of 59 [27%] voters disagreed, respectively).Clinicians and patients are encouraged to incorporate these well-validated, quick-to-perform, and easy-to-use instruments into their clinic, selecting the instruments that best fit their need. These assessments are meant to enhance, not replace, the patient-clinician encounter, and to support real-world research and health care improvement.