作者
Emanuele Cerulli Irelli,Enrico Cocchi,Barbara Mostacci,Biagio Orlando,Joanna Gesche,Roberto Caraballo,Simona Lattanzi,Gionata Strigaro,Cecilia Catania,Patrizia Pulitano,Chiara Panzini,Edoardo Pronello,Angelo Pascarella,Sara Casciato,Chiara Pizzanelli,Loretta Giuliano,Veronica Viola,Francesco Fortunato,Giancarlo Di Gennaro,Antonio Gambardella,Angelo Labate,Francesca Felicia Operto,Anna Teresa Giallonardo,Betül Baykan,Christoph P. Beier,Carlo Di Bonaventura
摘要
Abstract Regulatory agencies have recently discouraged the prescription of topiramate (TPM) to women of childbearing potential with epilepsy due to growing evidence of the teratogenic and neurodevelopmental risks associated with its use during pregnancy. It remains, however, unclear whether the use of TPM in this population can be supported to some extent by its high effectiveness. In this multicenter, retrospective, cohort study performed at 22 epilepsy centers, we investigated the comparative effectiveness of TPM and levetiracetam (LEV) given as first‐line antiseizure medication in a cohort of women of childbearing potential with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). A total of 336 participants were included, of whom 24 (7.1%) received TPM and 312 (92.9%) LEV. Women treated with TPM had significantly higher risks of treatment failure and treatment withdrawal and were less likely to achieve seizure freedom at 12 months compared to women treated with LEV. In conclusion, this study highlighted a low tendency among clinicians to use TPM in women of childbearing potential with IGE, anticipating the recently released restrictions on its use. Furthermore, the available data on effectiveness do not appear to support the use of TPM in this population.