近距离放射治疗
医学
杠杆(统计)
平面图(考古学)
放射治疗计划
医学物理学
灵活性(工程)
适应(眼睛)
前列腺近距离放射治疗
集合(抽象数据类型)
计算机科学
放射治疗
放射科
人工智能
物理
光学
考古
程序设计语言
统计
历史
数学
作者
Leah R. M. Dickhoff,Renzo J. Scholman,Danique L.J. Barten,Ellen M. Kerkhof,Jelmen J. Roorda,Laura A. Velema,Lukas J.A. Stalpers,Bradley R. Pieters,Peter A. N. Bosman,Tanja Alderliesten
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2023.10.005
摘要
PURPOSEWithout a clear definition of an optimal treatment plan, no optimization model can be perfect. Therefore, instead of automatically finding a single “optimal” plan, finding multiple, yet different near-optimal plans, can be an insightful approach to support radiation oncologists in finding the plan they are looking for.METHODS AND MATERIALSBRIGHT is a flexible AI-based optimization method for brachytherapy treatment planning that has already been shown capable of finding high-quality plans that trade-off target volume coverage and healthy tissue sparing. We leverage the flexibility of BRIGHT to find plans with similar dose-volume criteria, yet different dose distributions. We further describe extensions that facilitate fast plan adaptation should planning aims need to be adjusted, and straightforwardly allow incorporating hospital-specific aims besides standard protocols.RESULTSResults are obtained for prostate (n = 12) and cervix brachytherapy (n = 36). We demonstrate the possible differences in dose distribution for optimized plans with equal dose-volume criteria. We furthermore demonstrate that adding hospital-specific aims enables adhering to hospital-specific practice while still being able to automatically create cervix plans that more often satisfy the EMBRACE-II protocol than clinical practice. Finally, we illustrate the feasibility of fast plan adaptation.CONCLUSIONSMethods such as BRIGHT enable new ways to construct high-quality treatment plans for brachytherapy while offering new insights by making explicit the options one has. In particular, it becomes possible to present to radiation oncologists a manageable set of alternative plans that, from an optimization perspective are equally good, yet differ in terms of coverage-sparing trade-offs and shape of the dose distribution.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI