Comparison of outcomes from tunnelled femorally inserted central catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters: a propensity score-matched cohort study

医学 导管 外周穿刺中心静脉导管 队列 血栓形成 外科 倾向得分匹配 队列研究 置信区间 中心静脉导管 深静脉 三级转诊医院 回顾性队列研究 内科学
作者
Craig McManus,Nicholas Mifflin,Renz Rivera,Sarah Vause,Ton Tran,Matthew D. Ostroff,Lorenza Harrowell,Steven A. Frost,Evan Alexandrou
出处
期刊:BMJ Open [BMJ]
卷期号:14 (5): e081749-e081749
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081749
摘要

Objectives To compare catheter-related outcomes of individuals who received a tunnelled femorally inserted central catheter (tFICC) with those who received a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the upper extremities. Design A propensity-score matched cohort study. Setting A 980-bed tertiary referral hospital in South West Sydney, Australia. Participants In-patients referred to the hospital central venous access service for the insertion of a central venous access device. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of all-cause catheter failure. Secondary outcomes included the rates of catheters removed because of suspected or confirmed catheter-associated infection, catheter dwell and confirmed upper or lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Results The overall rate of all-cause catheter failure in the matched tFICC and PICC cohort was 2.4/1000 catheter days (95% CI 1.1 to 4.4) and 3.0/1000 catheter days (95% CI 2.3 to 3.9), respectively, and when compared, no difference was observed (difference −0.63/1000 catheter days, 95% CI −2.32 to 1.06). We found no differences in catheter dwell (mean difference of 14.2 days, 95% CI −6.6 to 35.0, p=0.910); or in the cumulative probability of failure between the two groups within the first month of dwell (p=0.358). No significant differences were observed in the rate of catheters requiring removal for confirmed central line-associated bloodstream infection (difference 0.13/1000 catheter day, 95% CI −0.36 to 0.63, p=0.896). Similarly, no significant differences were found between the groups for confirmed catheter-related DVT (difference −0.11 per 1000 catheter days, 95% CI −0.26 to 0.04, p=1.00). Conclusion There were no differences in catheter-related outcomes between the matched cohort of tFICC and PICC patients, suggesting that tFICCs are a possible alternative for vascular access when the veins of the upper extremities or thoracic region are not viable for catheterisation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
玻玻应助uulsj采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
情怀应助zhy采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
柠小檬c发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
慧慧完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
sorato完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
小嘎发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助文献狗采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
bhfhq完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
隐形曼青应助舒适的初雪采纳,获得10
6秒前
广州南发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
chen完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
大模型应助直率的勒采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
想毕业完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
彦希发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助lixm采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
充电宝应助旦丁洋采纳,获得10
11秒前
Phi.Wang发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
平常的无极完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
代骜珺发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
笨笨松发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
hbuhfl完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
komorebi完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
酷波er应助温婉的篮球采纳,获得10
16秒前
ggg关闭了ggg文献求助
17秒前
Rqbnicsp发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
l玖应助wyg117采纳,获得10
19秒前
江浪浪应助euphoria采纳,获得20
20秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Le dégorgement réflexe des Acridiens 800
Defense against predation 800
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3135818
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2786651
关于积分的说明 7778773
捐赠科研通 2442821
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1298711
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625212
版权声明 600866