Agreement of a clinical scoring system with allergic anaphylaxis in suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions: prospective validation of a new tool

医学 围手术期 类胰蛋白酶 过敏反应 免疫球蛋白E 过敏 过敏反应 皮肤病科 麻醉 外科 内科学 肥大细胞 免疫学 抗体
作者
Paul H.M. Sadleir,Russell C. Clarke,Catherine E. Goddard,Peri Mickle,Peter R. Platt
出处
期刊:BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:129 (5): 670-678
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.034
摘要

Abstract

Background

A clinical scoring system to estimate the likelihood that a reaction represents a perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction has been devised using a Delphi consensus process. Agreement of this clinical scoring system with the outcome of allergological assessment would allow the use of this tool in post-resuscitation and subsequent management of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction and potentially as a new standard reference for clinical investigations.

Methods

We prospectively scored 301 cases of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction according to the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme. Classification of cases was by allergological workup based on immediate and delayed investigations. The discrimination and calibration of the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme was compared with results from an expert panel of allergologists, skin testing, mast cell tryptase ratios, and specific IgE assays, as was agreement by Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results

The Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme predicted cases of allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction with comparable discrimination to an expert panel, mast cell tryptase formula, and specific IgE assays in anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs. Using a score threshold of 15 or greater to indicate allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction, the sensitivity was 88.9%, with a specificity of 79.4%. Prospectively, the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme correctly classified a greater number of subjects than the expert panel and the optimal post hoc binary logistic regression model (86% vs 85% vs 84%), however it was inferior to skin testing.

Conclusion

The Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme predicts allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity using features of the acute syndrome. This approach could guide algorithms for the post-resuscitative management of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity, and identify patients requiring drug provocation challenge.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小水滴完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Lily完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
zyq完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
标致冬日完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
LEON完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
chang完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
aikeyan完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
缺缺完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
xxxksk完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
碳烤小肥肠完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Dandy完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Fjun完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
科研蜗牛完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Cc完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
心理可达鸭完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高贵幼枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
pigpromax发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
鸢一折纸完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
AAAAL完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
友好的牛排完成签到,获得积分0
19秒前
达达完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
空龙完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
一杯奶茶完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
CYT完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
香菜完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
挣扎的人完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
Arimson发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
lily完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
lililili发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
冰阔罗完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
LiShan完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
tangyong完成签到,获得积分0
26秒前
小蘑菇应助123采纳,获得10
26秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6554899
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8339335
关于积分的说明 17865415
捐赠科研通 5672111
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2940121
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1915984
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1785755