医学
物理疗法
骨关节炎
心理干预
手法治疗
随机对照试验
物理医学与康复
运动疗法
力量训练
康复
荟萃分析
膝关节痛
替代医学
内科学
病理
精神科
作者
M.J. Jansen,Wolfgang Viechtbauer,Antoine F. Lenssen,Erik Hendriks,Rob A. de Bie
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1836-9553(11)70002-9
摘要
What are the effects of strength training alone, exercise therapy alone, and exercise with additional passive manual mobilisation on pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis compared to control? What are the effects of these interventions relative to each other?A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Adults with osteoarthritis of the knee. INTERVENTION TYPES: Strength training alone, exercise therapy alone (combination of strength training with active range of motion exercises and aerobic activity), or exercise with additional passive manual mobilisation, versus any non-exercise control. Comparisons between the three interventions were also sought.The primary outcome measures were pain and physical function.12 trials compared one of the interventions against control. The effect size on pain was 0.38 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.54) for strength training, 0.34 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.49) for exercise, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.96) for exercise plus manual mobilisation. Each intervention also improved physical function significantly. No randomised comparisons of the three interventions were identified. However, meta-regression indicated that exercise plus manual mobilisations improved pain significantly more than exercise alone (p = 0.03). The remaining comparisons between the three interventions for pain and physical function were not significant.Exercise therapy plus manual mobilisation showed a moderate effect size on pain compared to the small effect sizes for strength training or exercise therapy alone. To achieve better pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis physiotherapists or manual therapists might consider adding manual mobilisation to optimise supervised active exercise programs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI