甲氨蝶呤
医学
异位妊娠
肌肉注射
优势比
置信区间
回顾性队列研究
人绒毛膜促性腺激素
外科
内科学
怀孕
遗传学
激素
生物
作者
Charlyne Herondelle,Andrew Spiers,Krystel Nyangoh-Timoh,Thibault Thubert,Arnaud Fauconnier,Pierre-Yves Moquet,Pierre‐Emmanuel Bouet,Guillaume Legendre
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.007
摘要
Study ObjectiveEvaluation of the efficacy of different injection sites of methotrexate in the treatment of nontubal ectopic pregnancies.DesignRetrospective multicenter study.SettingMulticenter, including 3 teaching hospitals, an intercommunal hospital, and a clinic.PatientsA total of 106 patients with nontubal ectopic pregnancies, including 59 interstitial, 39 cesarean scar, and 8 cervical or isthmic.InterventionsOverall, 58 patients received methotrexate via intramuscular injection (IM group), 35 received methotrexate via in situ injection (IS group), and 13 received a combination of both in situ and intramuscular injections of methotrexate (IS + IM group).Measurements and Main ResultsThe main end point of this study was measured via the primary success rate (defined as a negative β-human chorionic gonadotropin level without recourse to any additional treatment) of treatment with methotrexate according to injection site. The primary success rate was 46.55% in the IM group, 60% in the IS group, and 61.54% in the IS + IM group, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the primary success rate of treatment was significantly correlated to the in situ injection of methotrexate, either solely or in conjunction with an intramuscular injection of methotrexate administered the following day, (odds ratio = 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–7.14).ConclusionSolely an intramuscular injection of methotrexate is a less efficient first-line treatment strategy for the conservative management of nontubular ectopic pregnancy. The use of an in situ injection of methotrexate should therefore be preferred.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI